Laserfiche WebLink
a <br /> �jc. T� . <br /> � � Clt� o� ORONO <br /> ' • (�� RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL • <br /> ! NO. 2806 <br /> • � • • <br /> 5. In 1975, a 1ot area variance was approved for the <br /> property to construct a residenri_confo m n 1Oaccessory <br /> approval required that the no g <br /> structure be removed prior to the issuance of the <br /> Certificate of Occupancy. <br /> , 6. The City failed to �nforce or implement the removal of <br /> , the structure upon the issuance of a� Certificate of <br /> � Occupancy for the new residence. <br /> ;. , . <br /> � `� - 7. � The structure received minimal repair and use from 1975 <br /> � � . <br /> F to" the• present. . <br /> �:: - . ., - . . .. , <br /> i . � 8. � . The applicants purchased the property in 1989 unaware of <br /> � , the unique history of the � structure nor of the City s policy <br /> j regarding the repair of structures that are located within <br /> � ..the lakeshare protected area (within 75' of the 929.4' <br /> i <br /> � elevation) . � � <br /> ` 9. The applicants performed major repairs to the structure . <br /> I <br /> including the construction of a 1.akeside deck, hard boar <br /> i •� siding to the upper level and the installation of windows. <br /> � 10. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application <br /> on January 1�6, 19 9 0 and recommended approva 1 of the af ter- <br /> the-fact variances based upon the following findings: <br /> � � A) The building has existed on the property for over <br /> . 40 years. � <br /> ` B) Tfie structure appears to be in good condition and <br /> ` �"' is used as a supportive/accessory use and not as a <br /> second residential. unit. <br /> 11.� On March 12, 1990 the Orono Council conceputally <br /> approved the after-the-fact variances�based on the following <br /> � findings: � <br /> ! A) The foundation of the structure provides stability <br /> I and support of the lakeshore bank. <br /> I� B) The structure has existed on. the� property <br /> � undetected for over 15 years. <br /> � C) The applicants had no know ledge of the original <br /> � requirement that the structure was to be removed nor <br /> ' � that the City requires special approvals before <br /> � � s.tructures within the lakeshore protected area � can <br /> � `J receive major or minor structural repair. <br /> I <br /> Page 2 of 5 <br /> ( <br /> ; <br /> � i <br />