Laserfiche WebLink
� `a � . . . t � .. � <br /> � •�.' � . � . _ ± . ' <br /> � � ,13:'. . . � ��� �I .� .7 � � . . <br /> ^� � �t �i � � �: � ���.� <br /> ' � u_��: i � �� �.:� C�t of ORONO � � ; � � ; ' � <br /> : ± ,:: . � �' � � . <br /> ,� j� � . � -, , . <br /> � RESOWTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL : <br /> � . NO. 2896 , <br /> � • - • • ' . <br /> ' ; <br /> � r i �; , - <br /> • � �, . <br /> , • A RESOLDTION GRANTING ' , <br /> � � A VARIANCE TO <br /> � � MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE � � <br /> , SECTION 10.22, SDBDIVISIONS 1 & 2 ' � <br /> ` FILE #1597 � <br /> . . ;,j . . _ ._.. . . ..; � � , . . ... <br /> . . -A � � � .. . . <br /> ' � WHEREAS, Ralph D. Burgess (hereinafter "the applicant") ' <br /> `� 'is ;the' owner of the property located at 2610 West Lafayette Road ` � ; <br /> � � �-�y�,within the City of Orono (hereinafter "City") and . legally .,� <br /> i described as follows: � <br /> � ; , • . All of Lot 11, Shorehills, Hennepin County, Minnesota except " <br /> , the southeasterly 15' , front and rear, (hereinafter "the . <br /> ' property���� and `,,..� , ; . . <br /> . , � WHEREAS, the app 1 i cant has app 1 ied to the City f or a <br /> ,��, variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivisions 1 <br /> : , :''and 2 to permit the construction of a 12'x21' deck located �55' � <br /> from the shoreline of Lake Minnetonka where a 75' setback is <br /> ' • ;��' normally required, and constituting hardcover in the 0-75' zone � <br /> � ,where hardcover is normally not allowed, and encroaching past the � . <br /> '' defined average lakeshore setback line where no encroachment � is <br /> `' normally allowed. � . <br /> NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Counci 1 of <br /> Orono, Minnesota: . <br /> . �. � <br /> FINDINGS - . � <br /> ' : ���; • 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #1597. � . � � <br /> 2. The property is located in the LR-1B Single Family , . <br /> . � Lakeshore Residential Zoning District. <br /> 1: 3. The Orono Planning C mmission reviewed this application <br /> � , on October 15 , 1990 , and recommended approval of the , <br /> �` t proposed variances based upon the following findings: ' � <br /> • . �; s- <br /> �. : A) A 12 'x2�1'�'`'deak existed in the proposed deck � . <br /> location unt'il ;September 1990. During the remodeling <br /> of the residence, a miscommunication between the <br /> �. applicant' s project manager and a subcontractor <br /> resulted in removal of the 12'x21' deck. Replacement <br /> of the deck in kind requires variance approval. <br /> • � . Page 1 of 4 " <br /> . . M� '• - ' . . . - -. . . ' ' . . <br />