Laserfiche WebLink
. �,: . • 4� _. . . � . . _. , . . � ..� . .�.= '4'�q, •h, -6 <br /> . ' . . '• '. '. . . - (¢,r-y �ft� i"t J . ,. <br /> ��� • �„� ' '.� � over 25% haa'`� ��ver, in some cases significantly,' ' �ecent variances �; � ' s . . . <br /> � . . . .W, <br /> . have been granted allowing hard cover in the same set back area to �. . • <br /> -� reach well beyond what is being requested in this application. � ' � � , <br /> � � 5. NUMBER 9 on form- The conditions (extreme slope to access land - � �� <br /> and two 75' setback zones) do,not apply generally to other�land in the . . . <br /> district. � � - <br />. 6. NUMBER 10 on form The granting of the application is necessary - � ,�. <br /> • for the preservation and enjoym�ent of a substantialproperty right of � <br /> � the applicant,�namely the west lake views and the right of neighbors to - �� <br /> � unobstructed views. � , . . . _. _ _. . � -. <br /> , 7. .NUMBER 11 on form The granting of the proposed variance will not � � � , <br /> in any way impair health safety comfort morals or in any other respect � , . ' <br /> �'��. <br /> be contrary to the intent of the zoning code. � . � <br /> : 8. NUMBER 12 on form The granting of such variance will not rnerely: � � �. <br /> serve as a convenience to the applicant but is necessary to alleviate � . . <br /> . demonstrable hardship or difficulty. . � . <br /> � .Hardship statement: . . . . . . . . <br /> �. - . .Additional hardcover is nec.essary to build a longer driveway so that the � � � <br /> - � _ ,hardship created by the slope of the land can be overcome. Also,with � <br /> � just one set back included for purposes of calculating hard cover, a . � <br /> � . . variance would actually not be necessary as the hard cover for this plan ; �.v � ,;-- <br /> , . �y� "w"would be 18.95% well under the 25%. However, the imposition of two " . '` <br /> � .. lake shore setbacks instead of one decreases the amount of square feet for �- <br /> � calculating hard cover to such a degree that prevents reasonable use of . . � <br /> - the property in the manner in�which it should rightfully be enjoyed. � . - <br /> _ �Additionally, the proposed home plan is not out of character and could be <br /> � - everi considered more conservative as compared to other surrounding . � a��: <br /> �pr ope rties in t he nei g h bor hoo d. Despi te�t he c lear har ds hips i n heren t in . � N � <br /> this property, compromises have already been made so that this proposal � �o o - <br /> provides overall improvement and brings it significantly more into � `� �' <br /> compliance with city requirements - curing many setback violations, . � Q � � <br /> re ducing t he size o f t he home, an d even improving t he existing har d v <br /> cover situation. � � � " <br /> . , . <br /> . � _ , � <br /> ' � <br /> � . � <br /> � � <br /> . . . � . <br /> ��x�-^���j����'`S� .i . . . - <br /> .� <br />