Laserfiche WebLink
Y. <br /> ` . Zoning File 08-3366 <br /> , June 16,2008 <br /> Page 3 of 3 <br /> reasonable way to provide a larger dining room. Staff would note the only location for an <br /> addition without a variance would be at the other end of the house. This would require a <br /> � major reorganization of the floor plan to enlarge the dining room. <br /> The Commission should make the same considerations regarding the open porch. To staff it <br /> appears that the open porch is primarily for a grill. If the Commission determines a place <br /> ' for a grill is appropriate, Staff would recommend that only a deck located at the other end of <br /> the room addition be allowed. The location is fai�ther fi•om the property line. <br /> The Commission should consider the layout of the stairs. To staff it appears that the two foot <br /> separation between the stairs and the room is to provide clearance for the casement <br /> windows. If another kind of window were used the space could be eliminated, placing the ' <br /> � steps farther.f-om the property line. � <br /> Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? <br /> Staff Recommendation <br /> Planning Staff recommends approval of the setback variances subject to: . <br /> L The open porch being omitted. If the Commission wishes to provide a space for a grill <br /> � it should be an open deck at the other end of the enclosed space. <br /> 2. To increase the setback, the two foot space between the stairs and the room being <br /> eliminated � <br /> 3. The underside of the structure being screened with lattice or a similar material. <br /> 4. Provision of a protective covenant for the arborvitae along the lot line. <br />