Laserfiche WebLink
Item#09-CC Agenda-OS/14/07 <br /> ' ' !g'�= , File#07-3259[Total Pages 41J <br /> Date Application Received: 12-20-06 � <br /> ' � Date Application Considered as Complete: 2-2-07 � <br /> 60-Day Review Period Expires: 4-3-07 � <br /> TO: Chair Keiupf and Orono Plaruung Commission <br /> • Ron Moorse, City Administrator <br /> . FROM: Mike Gaffron,Plaruiing Director . . <br /> DATE: April 11, 2007 � <br /> SUBJECT: #07-3259 Lake Country Builders for Kathy&Gary Gangstee, 1374 Rest Point <br /> Road. -Variances -REVISED PLANS -Public Hearing <br /> " 3-19-07: TABLED WITHOUT DISCUSSION AT APPLICANT'S REQUEST � <br /> Zoning District: LR-1B, Siiigle Family Lakeshore Residential, 1-acre/140' minimum _ <br /> Lot Area/Width: 28,500 s.f. (0.65 acres)/ 131' @ shoreline, 138' @ 75' setback � . <br /> Application Status: The applicants have submitted a revised site plan, revised building <br /> plans and elevations, and revised hardcover calculations. In fihese new plans, the existing <br /> house will be completely removed, and a new 2-story home of approximately the same 1250 <br /> s.f. footprint area and oriented east-west rather than north-south will be constructed to meet the <br /> required 30' street setback. The 2-story connecting link to the garage is still proposed. As a <br /> result of these revisions, and the consideration of this �site as a total replacement, the only <br /> variances required are: � � <br /> 1)lot area(0.65 acre where 1.0 acre is required); <br /> 2)hardcover: 75-250' zone: 27.4%proposed where 30.3%exists and 25%is allowed; <br /> 0-75' zone: 7.72%proposed where 9.0%e�ists and 0%is allowed; and <br /> 3) side setback for existing garage attachment and upward expansion: 9.1' existiug where <br /> 10' is required. . � <br /> 4)variance to Section 78-i432 re: Accessory Structures(see Exh.F and page 5) <br /> One of the property owners' goals continues to be the ability to retain the noncon£orming pool <br /> which is partially within the 0-75' zone. � <br /> Staff Recommei��lation: , <br /> Tlie applicants liave responded to the Planning Commission's directioiz froin the February <br /> meeting. The primary issue for Planning Commission to consider is whether or to what <br /> eatent a hardcover variailce is appropriate for the site. Planning Conunission should . <br /> address: <br /> -Whether applicants should be granted a hardcover variance to be allowed to keep the <br /> pool, given that it is nonconforming and partially ui the 0-75' zone, and that it is the <br /> primary reason for excess hardcover on the site... <br /> -Whether a hardcover variance should be granted for the 75-250' zone, giveu that this is , <br /> considered as a total rebuild on a lot that is nearly conforming in .width and has a <br /> substantial hardcover allotment for the 75-250' zone... <br /> - Whe�lier there is any issue with attaching house to tlie e�isting garage that is slightly <br /> too close to the lot line... • <br />