My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-19-2008 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2008
>
02-19-2008 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/27/2012 8:15:56 AM
Creation date
7/27/2012 8:15:51 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
136
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
1 . . . . <br /> , : . . ������ � . <br /> Page 1 of 3 <br /> HARDSHIP DOCUM ENTATION FORM <br /> This form is a required submittal for ALL variance applications. An application <br /> will not be considered complete or placed on any meeting agendas until this form is <br /> complete and submit�ed to the City. � <br /> Minnesota State Statutes Section 394.27, Subdivision 7 requires that a hardship be <br /> . � demonstrated in order for a variance to be granted. The hardship must be unique to the <br /> property as variances run.with the land and not the land owner. Personal and economic � <br /> sifuations are nof considered valid hardships. In order for an application to be heard by <br /> the Planning Commission and City Council a hardship having merit must be <br /> demonstrated. <br /> HOW DO 1 PROVE A HARDSHIP�? . <br /> � This form has 12 points outlining the basis City staff uses to determine if a hardship � <br /> exists and how the variance will affect the surrounding community. To prove a hardship, <br /> , , address all the relevant points listed below and answer them as clearly as possible. <br /> Since you are requesting the code exception, you have the burden of proving that the <br /> variance is justified. The information the City receives is what is used in determining a <br /> denial or approval recommendation. If you leave something out it will not be considered. <br /> . Please address each of these hardship criferia as they relate to the request (some.may � . <br /> � not apply): � <br /> 1.. "The property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under <br /> conditions allowed by the official controls." � <br /> (�.�'�t� 1 C'�.�'�ROe,.S �o �4' �'4'��flt�J �S S14�F�. <br /> �A�S 5 l S D F . <br /> n✓� I?ti (��-+-�t . <br /> 2. "The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property not <br /> . created qy the landowner." .� . <br /> �.Xl sT�K S FtR z.It�RAa�S R.o�-r..r� ,G�l�����A�.O 7�� <br /> STw�r.T.wqw w kS i,a DLR-G .r�, ��t+�.l D.�.dPc.it�-�y <br /> ..v !_�4 ��v�e-�[�'y�'�'� '�"v �.V �Zmo;� _ °, ��. . <br /> ,.:., „ ;; .. t ;� . <br /> 3."�`` ''"The variance,,if�:,granfed,vuilllnot alter�the�essentiaJ:chara;ct�r,:of,tth�s locality." <br /> . `t-k OS tl� ��l. �c f�' 'C'�c_ <br /> �_ -�t�. L. <br /> . 4. "Economic considerations alone shall not constitute an undue hardship if <br /> reasonable use for the properly exists under the terms of the Zoning Chapter." <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.