|
• r
<br /> , ,�� ,_ ,f,- _ - N�'° ! i� �!'
<br /> � = �CN'1� rfi G c ,
<br /> I�9IYdUTES �F THE PT�FiIJZdIPdG COMMISSIOYd PQEETIAdG EEZ,D tdOVF.�lBER 17, 1986
<br /> ZONI11iG AFRLYd�P�4EYdT — PERFORA�AY3CE STAIdDARDS FOR NO1�T—kE1VTAL/ ' �
<br /> GIIEST APA.RTN1EIdTS Tn�ITHIIJ PRI2dCIPAL RESIDENCES ' �
<br /> POBLIC SF..I�RII�G 10:50 — 10:5I. • '
<br /> fihe Afficlavit of Publicati.on was noted.
<br /> • No one was present from the public regarding this matter
<br /> • and the pvblic hearing was closed. '
<br /> Assistant 7oning Administrator Gaffron explained the
<br /> intent of the proposed amendment to establish
<br /> � performance standards f�r nor:-rer,tal guest apartments
<br /> within principal residences. He stated that the
<br /> Plarininy Commission shoulc3 address these iss�ues: �
<br /> � a) Ts the "double the lot area" standard reasonab2e
<br /> for a guest apartment. � ' ~
<br /> by Parking concerns? •
<br /> Chairma� Kel ley stated� that he relt such guest y,, :'
<br /> • apartments shou�d be allowed under a conaitional use � - ;,
<br /> . permit. Fie would like to avoid c�mpleze separate living
<br /> ' . .. . . areas. ' � � _��.
<br /> % �;.
<br /> Eellows stated that she would like to avaid• an exterior
<br /> ' appearar�ce o•f a duplex, but not legislate against live- . �'�
<br /> � - in help etc. . ' `
<br /> F�.
<br /> � � • Taylor stated that he was not as concerned abaut the
<br /> separate �ntrance issue, and would prefer to c�or.tinue
<br /> ' . treating these on � case by case basis.
<br /> ' . Planning Cammission directed staff to bring bacY. to
<br /> their next mee::.ing a proposed �aording and performance
<br /> standards for guest apartments as . a Gonditional f}se,
<br /> incorporating the following� concepts:
<br /> - , l. Lot area is not a concern if septic and parking
<br /> concerns are met; performance standards for these
<br /> �. should be proposed. � '
<br /> 2. The Conditional Use Permit rev�.ew process will
<br /> address the visual impact on �he neighborhood of
<br /> each specific situat.ion, with the goai that the
<br /> � � guest apartment should not be an obvious second
<br /> dwe lling. unit when view�d fram without, and� should
<br /> not have the appearance of a duplex, i.e. not have �
<br /> two obvi.otzs "main entrances" . •
<br /> � 3. Primary access to the guest apartment should be
<br /> from within the residence, but secondary acce�ses
<br /> are al.lowable. •
<br /> • 4. Wet bars and basement kitchens proposed with new
<br /> homes or remodelinqs that �re obviously not meant to
<br /> become secon�d dwelling units, need not apply for a
<br /> Condi.tional Use Permit as long as t;�e building
<br /> permit states that they may not become second �;
<br /> dwelling uniLS. . . . .
<br /> • . , . � . .. , , . '",�.:
<br /> . . :�. ,:
<br /> _ `p�X't. r_ L?xF? �. 'a.x; <C� ,�r"YYjK'C}��� :4r^i�. C,C�.a?�`KnG:)hi'�'�.'s+Cl.s",v'R�.^,rf y 'R'�.���p�.#?�.h�.z. "�;':` �' �� � ,;`
<br /> " .,�'•:: _ .� t � � �f�.g "7'�.'� �,f�'a .���G
<br /> - �:'�.: —z .,4�':4� iN.^,��. � ''i%°`�*i::.;:... .:5�:�}dei3i.'` _'r „�',E,y!`�":::,::Fxi��Siq?�:nr�.��;. t�.�' ta�y-P
<br /> . cF;� ��.' .� .,'� f i E..� e� .�r�'' .,��. �c.:x�• tt,�����''_ ''t'" '�'.y..�k•..�.:�,, ,?ry�.��,r.l.`+;; �•,"Y
<br /> � s�:� v r;�.. .,� ..+�',,�"rRS+�".'���.�. ��' z:. t� ;1'`��":.z`•a:;�it�s.> ;� ;r"'„.+,�b` �t� c.�;+�.� <••
<br /> .i7� _ '�i�+; !�r��+.'�'::, .,.."�"f�:.�°t. i��',;•,;�K" � �'��. �."i;:a. a:x �r Y �- „ �,,.r":�-._t'�S'
<br /> _ . !trf...�. 'vt�.��� t:e.. ;� �,�i .t�r�'�p`�i:.G'��; �.
<br /> .. .. i. . .. � . .� . . ' . � . , , . •y���:-. „ .�tf,�.��.,:.�'��„c.�t.• (�+{.'_� E L ..
<br /> . . .. . . . . � . . . .._ . ..... .. .... ....�i. . ..v�`u�^.f,,,�,-s,�:;���:1:'�sr=q�::�:r
<br />
|