Laserfiche WebLink
�= f <br /> • FILE#08-3335 <br /> 16 January 2008 <br /> Page 2 of 4 <br /> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ <br /> � LOT ANALYSIS WORSH�EET <br /> Lot Area/VlLidth: <br /> RR-1 B Lot Area Lot Width • <br /> Re uired - 87,120 s.f. 2 acres � 200' <br /> Actual 84,639 s.f. 1.94 total acre 368' <br /> Accessorv Structure Setbacks: - " ` � <br /> � RR-1 B Required Existing Proposed <br /> 130' home No change —home <br /> Front 50' 85' pool . <br /> � � 59' ool buildin <br /> _ 63' home No change - home <br /> Rear �� �� ��� 50' � �11�0'��pool <br /> 165' ool buildin <br /> 144' home No change - home <br /> West Side 30' 74' pool <br /> 64' ool buildin <br /> � 127' home No change —home <br /> East Side. � 30' � � 260' pool - <br /> - . 260' ool buildin <br /> . . �. � � Structural Coveraqe: � <br /> The lot is nearly 2 acres, which would place it outside the structural coverage limitation. <br /> The existing structural level is 3.1% and the (un-roofed) pool is not included in the <br /> _ structural coverage calculation. The pool building square footage would raise the <br /> � structural level to 3.8%. ' <br /> Hardcover Calculations: <br /> The applicants' property is not within the 1000' shoreland overlay district; hardcover <br /> . restrictions do not apply. . <br /> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ <br /> Variance: Accessory Structures ahead of Principal Building - <br /> The applicants' home is set back considerably farther than the required front yard. This <br /> poses a problem when attempting to locate a location for an accessory structure. The <br /> . proposed pool will not add to the massing on the propert� as it is proposed to be in- <br /> ground. The proposed pool building consists of 560 s.f. and will be located streetward of . <br /> the pool to offer screening for the homeowners from the street. <br /> This property is served by an on-site septic system as opposed to City sewer. City <br /> sewer is not an option as the property is not located within the MUSA. Therefore prior to <br /> allowing the applicants to use up potential septic treatment area in their yard the City <br /> must be�satisfied that sufficient alternate septic locations are identified. <br /> 2 <br />