Laserfiche WebLink
r <br />MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />December 12, 2011 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />(6. #11 -3530 MIKESEELAND OFPROPERTYRESOURCESMANAGEMENT COMPANY, <br />LLC, 2725 WAYZATA BOULEVARD WEST, Continued) <br />16. Fencing parallel to Wayzata Boulevard shall utilize slats or another screening mechanism deemed <br />acceptable by the City Engineer. <br />17. The applicant shall provide a limited and updated survey and design south of the east parking lot <br />and new access road to the south end of the building. Drainage shall be routed south for <br />emergency overflow (EOF) purposes unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. <br />18. The applicant shall obtain all necessary permits and approvals from the City and other applicable <br />entities with jurisdiction prior to any construction. <br />19. Construction shall follow the survey and plans as submitted or as required to be updated by <br />the City Engineer. <br />20. The City Engineer shall have the option to inspect the property at the applicant's expense during <br />the construction process to ensure ongoing compliance with all engineering requirements. <br />21. The conditional use permit shall expire one year from the date of resolution if the use is not <br />established; City Council approval will be required for any subsequent extension. <br />The City Council has three options: 1) adopt the approval resolution, 2) direct staff to draft a denial <br />resolution, or 3) table the application. The 60 -day review period expires on the 18th of this month and <br />can be extended another 60 days if necessary. <br />Rahn asked where the hardcover is being reduced on the site. <br />Gozola indicated the hardcover portion to the south is being reduced. <br />Rahn asked if the City should be concerned with the height of the outdoor storage. <br />Gozola stated it is already a parking area and that they are almost treating it more as an outdoor parking <br />area by requiring that all storage be within a vehicle or on wheels. The Planning Commission felt it <br />would be more appropriate to have an oversized boat or RV located here rather than in someone's back <br />yard. <br />Rahn noted there was a letter from the City of Mound included in the packet and asked whether other <br />facilities have height limitations. <br />Gozola stated the applicant would be able to address that question. <br />McMillan asked what the rationale was for not allowing more than three employees. <br />Gozola indicated that number was arrived at following discussions with the applicant. That limit could be <br />removed if Council wishes. <br />Page 6 of 18 <br />