My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12-12-2011 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
2011
>
12-12-2011 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/26/2012 4:20:31 PM
Creation date
7/26/2012 4:10:14 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />• December 12, 2011 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />(20. GOAL SETTING PROCESS FOR 2012, Continued) <br />Franchot stated in his view there should be a facilitator to allow all of City Staff and Council to actively <br />be involved in the process and not in running it. Franchot stated in his opinion they have a mis- weighted <br />group in that the Council is more management or bosses and staff works for the Council and that it is <br />asking an awful lot of the group to function well. Franchot stated a facilitator is a small cost that has a big <br />benefit and that he has never seen a group do it well without someone acting as a facilitator. <br />Rahn stated he has worked for various cities over the past 21 years and that he has never been asked to sit <br />down with the Council to develop goals. <br />Franchot noted that is the point and that Council is asking Staff to work on developing common goals. <br />Rahn commented he would like to think they can do it without a facilitator. <br />McMillan stated the Council can try to do the process without a facilitator. McMillan noted the city <br />administrator has her foot in both camps since she is part of staff and also works with the Council directly <br />and is the bridge between both groups. McMillan stated the Council may want to consider a facilitator. <br />Rahn stated it might be an easier decision to make after the goals are submitted by the two groups. The <br />Council could then review the goals and make the decision on whether a facilitator is needed. <br />• Franchot noted three of the Council Members have indicated a desire for a facilitator and asked why they <br />are not going ahead with a facilitator. <br />McMillan asked whether he would like her to check prices with A.B. Reynolds. <br />Franchot stated he would. <br />McMillan stated she will check prices and bring back information for further discussion in January. <br />Loftus asked whether the Council is comfortable with her proposing someone for the utility study group <br />with Long Lake with the appointments in January along with the Mayor. <br />Franchot stated he does not consider himself particularly qualified but that he would be happy to be on the <br />group. <br />Printup also offered to participate in the utility study group. <br />McMillan commented that Long Lake was anticipating that Franchot would be on the committee. <br />Loftus confirmed that McMillan and Franchot would be appointed to the utility study group. <br />Loftus noted the city has an opportunity for the employees to do some planned giving through payroll <br />deductions. Currently the employees have the option of donating to the United Way. Franchot and <br />Loftus met with the MN Environmental Fund and this group would be another opportunity that could be <br />offered for employee participation. Loftus noted this does not require any Council action but she is <br />• interested to know whether any of the Council Members have any concerns with this item. Loftus <br />reiterated it is a voluntary charitable opportunity for the employees. <br />Page 16 of 18 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.