My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-14-2011 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
2011
>
11-14-2011 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/26/2012 4:20:08 PM
Creation date
7/26/2012 4:08:42 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, November 14, 2011 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />(6. 11 -3528 TIMOTHYAND DANIELLE KOEHLER, 4205 NORTH SHORE DRIVE, <br />Continued) <br />Bremer asked why there is no survey. <br />Koehler stated they started construction in July and he was not aware they needed a permit. Originally <br />they wanted to install permeable pavers because he knew they could not increase the amount of <br />hardcover. Koehler indicated he asked his landscaper to design something that would not impact the <br />hardcover. They were told that permeable pavers would be counted as hardcover so they asked about <br />gravel and were told that gravel does not count as hardcover. They then started the landscaping project. <br />As they got into the project, the City said the gravel would be considered hardcover and that they could <br />not continue the work. Koehler indicated they then had a discussion with Staff on what is considered <br />hardcover. The city then asked him to get a survey since the original survey was not accurate. <br />Koehler noted they got the hardcover survey done and then there were some issues that were <br />nonconforming with the original resolution, such as the retaining wall. This process has literally gone on <br />for months. Last month they had the Planning Commission meeting and negotiated what they thought was <br />a fair solution. <br />Bremer asked what is the purpose of the new survey. <br />Curtis indicated it is to verify the landscape plan, which has changed and does not match the current • <br />survey. The City Council could limit the applicant to the amount of hardcover listed in the hardcover <br />calculations. The current plan does not match the survey that the hardcover is based on. <br />Koehler pointed out the little piece behind the driveway is the difference. They need to make it deep <br />enough to back up into. <br />Bremer stated the Council could do a maximum number. <br />Curtis stated that is why Staff is willing to bring it forward without a formal survey. Staff is relatively <br />confident with the hardcover numbers but that typically the Council has a final survey before approving a <br />resolution. <br />Koehler indicated they did attempt to have the survey completed before the Council meeting but their <br />surveyor is out due to surgery. <br />Franchot asked whether the approval by the Planning Commission takes into account the little piece by <br />the driveway. <br />Curtis indicated that it does but that it is not included on the survey. <br />Koehler noted that little piece is on their landscape plan. <br />Rahn asked Staff to explain the patio situation. Rahn asked if the patio will be relocated. <br />Curtis indicated the patio will not be relocated. The patio was originally put in without a permit and that • <br />it has become deteriorated over the years. <br />Page 10 of 16 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.