My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-24-2011 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
Historical
>
2010-2019
>
2011
>
10-24-2011 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/26/2012 4:19:58 PM
Creation date
7/26/2012 4:07:48 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
AI NUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, October 24, 2011 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. • <br />(8. CRYSTAL BAY ROAD SPEED BUMPS, Continued) <br />Loftus stated a City vehicle or trailer also hit a speed hump and caused some minor damage, which was <br />repaired by the Public Works Department. <br />McMillan commented the City Council is glad the speed humps have worked out well for the residents. <br />Loftus asked whether Staff should contact the other residents regarding the location of the fourth speed <br />hump or whether they should have the Public Works Department install it in the recommended location. <br />Rahn commented the location recommended by the City Engineer seems logical since there is a big space <br />between those two locations. <br />Loftus indicated they did receive one e-mail expressing that same concern and that the City Engineer feels <br />it should be installed at that location. Loftus indicated initially those property owners had indicated they <br />were not interested in a speed hump in front of their house. <br />Foy noted the majority of those properties are set back from the road quite a bit and that the other homes <br />are located closer to the road. <br />Printup commented it appears that the majority of the City Council is in favor of adding a fourth speed <br />hump. <br />Mayor McMillan concurred, and requested Staff to check with the residents on the location of the fourth is <br />speed hump. <br />The City Council took no formal action on this item. <br />9. MINNERAHA CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT (MCWD) PRESENTATION <br />Eric Evenson, Administrator for the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District, addressed the City Council <br />regarding aquatic invasive species or AIS. Evenson stated the MCWD is looking for input from the lake <br />communities on a new proposal to develop a long -term plan for dealing with the problem and the impacts <br />AIS has on the quality of the lake. <br />The cost of dealing with AIS is higher once the issue is in the system than it is to prevent it. Zebra <br />mussels have been in Lake Minnetonka for a couple of years now. One lake service provider has <br />indicated he is contemplating charging $500 to take a dock out of the lake, scrape it, and spray it down. <br />The MCWD is also considering painting the dam to keep the zebra mussels off of it and to coat the <br />intakes to keep the fire intakes from plugging up with zebra mussels. The cost has been estimated to be in <br />the area of $500 to $1000 per homeowner simply to deal with the zebra mussels and does not include the <br />costs to deal with other AIS. There are approximately 10,000 docks on Lake Minnetonka, which would <br />result in approximately a $5 million price tag to deal with those docks. Evenson reiterated that it is <br />cheaper to prevent it than it is to deal with it once it is in the system. <br />Lake Minnetonka is also considered a super spreader since it is the most heavily used lake in Minnesota. <br />The MCWD anticipates that the zebra mussels will spread to Long Lake, Christmas Lake, Lake • <br />Independence, Medicine Lake, Lake Calhoun, etc. Evenson stated since zebra mussels are already in <br />Page 4 of 19 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.