Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, September 12, 2011 <br />• 7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />(10. #11 -3521 TAMI HELMER, 3131 CASCO CIRCLE, Continued) <br />Sharratt stated due to the vegetation, it is not possible to see through that area in the summertime. <br />McMillan reiterated that it is an average lakeshore setback issue. <br />Franchot asked if the situation is being made worse. <br />McMillan indicated in her view it is. <br />Franchot asked if the Council can get a picture of where the actual average lakeshore setback line is <br />located. Franchot stated in his view it is a sight line issue only. <br />Curtis displayed the average lakeshore setback line and pointed out that it cuts back into the existing <br />garage and is ahead of it. The corner of the deck does not extend further into the average setback and <br />they are maintaining the sight line from the home to the lake. <br />McMillan stated because they are locating the proposed garage addition over existing driveway, they are <br />able to gain additional hardcover versus swapping hardcover for structural coverage. <br />Rahn stated in his view that is what Mr. Jones is saying. They are talking about a building that is already <br />sitting too far forward, and even though they did not extend it closer to the lake, there is more structure <br />being proposed. <br />Rahn noted the draft resolution says the deck will result in minimal negative impact to adjacent property <br />owners, but that in his view there should be no impact. The sight line is one issue but that he personally <br />would be more concerned with the noise since the area of entertainment has moved closer to the lot line. <br />Rahn stated he has a hard time approving something where an adjacent neighbor was opposed to it, which <br />is one of the main reasons why the City has an average lakeshore setback. <br />Curtis stated the average lakeshore setback is to preserve the view of the lake. The noise or activity could <br />be there anyway without the deck but that it is an issue to consider as part of the variance request. <br />Al Wahlin, 3 13 1 Casco Circle, stated in regards to the proposed deck, they have carefully considered the <br />current rules and regulations and they were also considerate of the neighbor to not come out past the <br />existing visual footprint that is currently in place. Wahlin commented they are not proposing anything <br />that is different than what he can currently see from his perspective. Wahlin stated they have worked <br />very hard to follow the rules and regulations that the City has set up as well as the rules of the DNR and <br />the State of Minnesota. They have gotten professional help from Mr. Sharratt. <br />Wahlin commented he is not sure how much one person can have control of their property but that he <br />understands and respects his neighbors and will continue to do that. Wahlin stated he also has a right to be <br />comfortable in his own home and that unfortunately the system is set up to pit one neighbor against <br />another and cause conflict. Wahlin stated he attempts to do what is right within the rules that are set up <br />and that they have tried to follow the rules and do what is required of them. The deck is within the <br />existing sight footprint. <br />Wahlin noted they also agreed to meet with Mr. Jones but that he did not want to meet with them. <br />Page 19 of 28, <br />