Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, July 25, 2011 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />• <br />(8. NAVARRE SIDEWALK SEGMENT TO DAKOTA RAIL TRAIL, Continued) <br />land for ponding due to a storm water issue at the intersection. There currently is no storm sewer in that <br />area and that they are not sure exactly where the water drains to. Kellogg stated based on the contours <br />and the information that his office has, back in 2003 the surveyors located a pipe underneath the roadway <br />in this area. Kellogg stated he went out with the Orono Public Works Department and attempted to locate <br />that pipe and it is their feeling the pipe is still there. <br />Kellogg stated the additional survey work would be required to document the location of the trees and <br />their size. They will need to prepare some type of preliminary drawing so they can better evaluate what <br />the impacts would be to each individual property. <br />Bremer asked if Mr. Kellogg has any idea how many easements will be required. <br />Kellogg stated he is hopeful that all that will be required is a temporary construction easement but that it <br />is likely the property owners would like some screening restored. <br />Rahn stated he would like to make the Hennepin County Regional Rail Authority aware of the City's <br />interest to complete this project. Rahn asked what type of retaining wall is being considered. <br />Kellogg indicated it would be a big block wall, which is a gravity wall system. This technology was not <br />available back in 2002. The options looked at back in 2002 for the wall included a sheet pile wall, which <br />• would have conflicted with the utilities, as well as a cast in place wall, which was cost prohibitive. A <br />traditional modular block wall that is seven or eight feet tall would require a geo grid back into the soil, <br />which would have a bigger impact on the property. Kellogg stated the big block wall can be constructed <br />seven feet tall without any reinforcement, which cuts down on the amount of excavation and would cause <br />less disruption to the properties. <br />Rahn asked what the cost was to complete this section back in 2002. <br />Kellogg indicated it was approximately $62,000 to construct the sidewalk from Lyric to Livingston but <br />that the City did not get to a point where there was a wall design done which would have taken it to the <br />next step. Lyric and Livingston has just a couple of minor block walls and the cost was primarily for the <br />concrete and the curb and gutter. Kellogg noted the plans depicted a seven foot wide sidewalk but what <br />was actually constructed was a six foot wide sidewalk. <br />Rahn commented he would like to move forward and speak with Three Rivers on a possible cost sharing <br />agreement. <br />McMillan stated she would prefer not to spend any money on this project until there is a better idea of <br />whether the City will be partnering up with Three Rivers and/or the Hennepin County Regional Railroad <br />Authority. <br />Kellogg asked whether the Council would like them to just complete bullet point one or complete bullet <br />points one and five. <br />• Bremer suggested representatives from Three Rivers and the Hennepin County Regional Railroad be <br />invited to a work session if there is interest on their part in this project. <br />Page 7 of 13 <br />