My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-11-2011 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2010-2019
>
2011
>
07-11-2011 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/26/2012 4:18:30 PM
Creation date
7/26/2012 3:57:56 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, July 11, 2011 <br />• 7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />5. #10 -3479 PHILLIP WIMPLE, 3095 CASCO POINT ROAD — VARIANCE <br />Phillip Whipple, Applicant, and Mike Sharratt, Designer, were present. <br />Curtis stated the applicant is requesting lot area and hardcover variances in order to remove the existing <br />principal structure and construct a new residence within the 75 -250 foot zone and a new detached garage <br />in the 250 -500 foot zone. The majority of the existing blacktop driveway will be maintained. However, <br />the circle drive configuration will be eliminated. A rain garden is also proposed, which will infiltrate <br />most of the storm water from the driveway hardcover in response to the Planning Commission's <br />direction. <br />The applicant originally made an application for similar variances in 2010 and was scheduled to appear <br />before the Planning Commission in July 2010. However, the 2010 Krummenacher ruling resulted in the <br />City's inability to review and grant variances as had been done in the past. The applicant requested their <br />application be tabled until July 2011 to allow for modifications in the statute and/or City Codes. The <br />variance standstill afforded the applicant time to slightly redesign his plan. The applicant now presents a <br />plan which results in a 583 square foot overall reduction in hardcover from the previous request. <br />The Planning Commission at its June meeting voted 6 to 0 to recommend approval of the hardcover and <br />lot width variances as proposed in conjunction with a rain garden to mitigate the excess hardcover from <br />the driveway. <br />• Planning Staff recommends approval of the variances consistent with the Planning Commission <br />recommendation. Submittal of a detailed rain garden design and conformance with the City Engineer's <br />recommendations will be required with the building permit application. <br />Rahn noted 194 square feet of hardcover was listed in Staffs report within the 0 -75 foot zone, and asked <br />whether that is being removed. <br />Curtis indicated the hardcover within the 0 -75 foot zone will be remaining as it currently exists. <br />Rahn noted a deck is typically not allowed in that zone. <br />Curtis stated the deck is nonconforming and that Staff was advised by the City Attorney to not request <br />removal of legally nonconforming structures. <br />Rahn asked what the practical difficulty is for allowing the excess hardcover in the 250 -500 foot zone <br />where 30 percent is allowed. Rahn indicated he understands the need for the driveway but that it appears <br />to be over by 600 or 700 square feet. Rahn asked whether the driveway area to the left of the tree will be <br />removed or what will remain in that area. <br />Curtis noted the dotted line is the area that will be removed. <br />Rahn stated the area is not acting as a turnaround and is simply excess hardcover. The applicants are <br />constructing a brand new home and that in the past the City has typically required the property owner to <br />start with a clean slate. If that area is removed, a variance may not be required. Rahn stated he is <br />attempting to figure out what the practical difficulty would be to not have that since it does not seem to <br />affect the turnaround for the garage and seems to be excess parking. <br />Page 5 of 19 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.