My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-23-2011 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2010-2019
>
2011
>
05-23-2011 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/26/2012 4:18:03 PM
Creation date
7/26/2012 3:56:09 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, May 23, 2011. <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />(9. #11 -3503 PUBLIC HEARING -CITY OF ORONO -ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT <br />LAKESHORE RESIDENTML ZONING DISTRICTS: D.00KRENTAL, Continued) <br />Rahn noted the City's handout states that new seasonal docks require a one -time $30 permit fee, and if the <br />dock is reinstalled in the same location, the fee is waived. <br />Gaffron indicated that language refers to the first time a new seasonal dock is installed. If a dock has <br />been there for the last 50 years, it can continue to go in at the same location without cost unless it is <br />relocated. Gaffron stated that may be a piece of the code that could be changed but that it is part of the <br />City's fee schedule. The fee covers the cost of Staff having to go out and inspect the dock the first time it <br />is installed to ensure it meets LMCD regulations. <br />Rahn stated he has a problem with the dock inspection since the LMCD already covers dock inspections <br />and setback measurements, and the City does not have zoning regulations for setbacks in the Code. Rahn <br />commented he has spoken with the LMCD and they have a difficult time enforcing dock regulations, <br />which is why the LMCD likes it when cities duplicate their efforts. Rahn stated he has spoken with other <br />planners around the lakeshore cities and they have indicated they are not interested in regulating boats and <br />do not want the legal issues associated with boat regulations. Rahn stated in his opinion the ordinance <br />needs some additional work. <br />Gaffron stated it is very rare that someone comes in and requests a license for a new dock at a site that has <br />never had a dock. <br />Printup asked what the typical complaint is. <br />Gaffron stated the typical complaint by the residents is that their neighbor is renting their dock out and <br />that people are coming in at all times of the day causing parking and neighborhood problems. In a <br />situation like that, the City will send an inspector out, take the boat license number, and send a letter to <br />the property owner and the boat owner informing them that it is illegal to be renting a boat slip. In the <br />past the City has taken people to court in this type of situation and has won in court in a couple of cases. <br />The LMCD has also been involved in similar cases. Gaffron reiterated that it is not an unusual thing to <br />receive a dozen or more of that type of call in a year. <br />Rahn asked if the LMCD also regulates dock rental. <br />Gaffron stated Staff can check to see to what level the LMCD regulates dock rental. <br />Curtis stated the LMCD website states that two restricted watercraft may be kept within a dock use area <br />for most lots. Four restricted watercraft may be kept within a dock use area provided all the following <br />conditions are met: There is a single - family structure on the lot, all restricted watercraft kept at the dock <br />or mooring must be owned by and registered to persons who live in the residential structure. It also talks <br />about the length of the shoreline and multiple dock licenses with the LMCD. <br />0 <br />Rahn suggested Staff speak with the LMCD. Rahn stated the ordinance uses the word rental but that in <br />his opinion the City should have an outlet for a neighbor who is allowing another neighbor, such as an <br />inlander, to keep his boat on his dock. Rahn stated in his opinion that happens rather frequently and that <br />the City should have some way to allow for dock use to happen if the property owner is not over the • <br />number of allowable boats per their length of Lakeshore. <br />Page 18 of 24 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.