Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, May 23, 2011 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />(8. #11 -3504 PUBLIC HEARING - CITY OF ORONO - ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT <br />RESIDENT1 L ZONING DISTRICTS. GARDENAS A PERMITTED USE, Continued) <br />Rahn stated it appears that the special event permit application could be manipulated to accommodate this <br />request and that the recommendations of the Planning Commission could be incorporated into the special <br />events permit. <br />Curtis stated in Staff's opinion it needs to be allowed as a principal use on a residential property or <br />specifically allowed in the code defining what a special event is. <br />Rahn commented he would be in favor of allowing a property owner on a private residential lot to have a <br />garden prior to constructing a primary home. <br />Printup indicated he would also be in favor of allowing a property owner on a private residential lot to <br />have a garden prior to constructing a primary home. <br />Franchot indicated he is generally in favor of that, and asked whether the list of recommendations is part <br />of the request that is being discussed tonight. <br />Curtis stated the recommendations are in specific reference to community gardening and that there could <br />be more requirements placed on community gardening by the City Council. <br />• <br />Rahn stated the problem the 'Planning Commission ran into is that every garden location is going to have • <br />different issues and that there needs to be some type of permit that would allow the Council to address <br />those individual circumstances and that the code amendment is to allow the garden as a permitted use. <br />Curtis stated Staff is recommending that gardening be allowed as a primary use on a residential vacant lot <br />and that Staff is also recommending that there be a license agreement to utilize the city -owned lot, which <br />is Option No. 2. <br />Rahn asked if the license agreement would then be addressing the insurance issues and the, list of <br />requirements being recommended by Staff. <br />Curtis stated the license agreement is in -place of a special event permit because Staff does not feel that <br />gardening would fall under a special event unless the code is changed to add it as a special event. <br />Mattick stated traditionally special events in the City have been day -long events and that a community <br />garden would extend over several months. A way to deal with that is to require certain conditions <br />specific to that land with the license agreement that are not necessarily conditions that the Council would <br />put on a zoning district. Mattick indicated the license agreement would not be something that the Council <br />would use if a private individual wanted to have a garden. Staff has been attempting to come up with <br />options to streamline that process. Mattick indicated parks are a broad definition for city controlled land <br />and that Staff contemplated the designation of park in conjunction with the licensing agreement so the <br />City would not be bound forever to this agreement but yet it would still address this situation. <br />Printup stated he does not see the need to change an entire ordinance for a community garden but that the <br />Council could agree to a permitted use for a garden on a residential lot without a structure. ' • <br />Bremer stated because the City owns the property, there needs to be some type of license. <br />Page 12 of 24 <br />