Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, May 9, 2011 <br />• 7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />(MA YORICO UNCIL REPORT, Continued) <br />Loftus stated the information was sent out initially after she received it and the results of the survey will <br />be discussed at a work session in June. <br />Printup stated the e -mail alerts, and notice in the city newsletter and on the city website have helped to <br />promote viewership. Printup commented that watching the City Council meetings appears to be popular <br />at the present time. <br />Franchot pointed out that the data provided by the LMCC on viewership does not reflect how many <br />people are watching the meetings on cable TV but just reflects the streaming online. <br />Printup noted at the Reconvened Board of Appeal and Equalization he had asked the question about the <br />difference in reassessment. Printup stated the reductions were significant and ranged from $70,000 to <br />over $130,000. The state law is that 20 percent of the homes are assessed each year. The homes have to <br />be looked at every five years, so it takes a cycle of five years before every home gets an inspection. <br />Printup noted the City's contract with the assessor's office for 2011 is $135,000. If the assessor's office <br />only views 20 percent of the homes, that breaks down to approximately $34 per parcel. If that number is <br />multiplied by five years, it comes to $170 per parcel. <br />Printup noted when he looked at other cities' costs, the breakdown per parcel was lower. The City of <br />• Minnetrista was around $148 a parcel, Medina was $143, and Excelsior was $111. Printup stated in his <br />view this might be something that should be discussed as part of the budget talks. Printup suggested the <br />assessor's office be contacted to find out why Orono's costs are higher. <br />Bremer pointed out that the new parcels are not included as part of that five year cycle yet. Bremer <br />commented it is important to attend the Board of Appeal and Equalization since the assessor's office <br />oftentimes will hear information that is new to their particular situation. Bremer pointed out that the <br />assessor will view any resident's property that requests an inspection. Bremer noted the assessor's office <br />can only do so much adjustment and that in her opinion the valuations went down more than they <br />typically have in the past and appear to be more responsive to changes in the market. <br />Franchot pointed out there were also a number of people that did not come to the meeting of the local <br />board that did have a reduction. <br />Bremer commented that the number of times the asses responds to a call and visits the property would be <br />helpful at the time of budget discussions. <br />McMillan asked whether the contract with the assessor's office is annual. <br />Olson indicated it is a renewable contract but that he is not sure what the renewal date is on the assessor's <br />contract. Olson indicated he will obtain that information and provide it to the Council. <br />McMillan noted she had a meeting with Commissioner Jeff Johnson and approximately 15 mayors. <br />During the meeting Commissioner Johnson asked each mayor to identify the top two issues in their <br />individual city and McMillan indicated she said roads and taxes, which is what most of the other mayors <br />mentioned as well. The other item was the storm water mandate called TMDL, which is a federal <br />mandate to quantify the nonpoint storm water pollution. A majority of the mayors were pretty upset <br />Page 15 of 17 <br />