My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-11-2011 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
2011
>
04-11-2011 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/26/2012 4:17:07 PM
Creation date
7/26/2012 3:53:17 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, April 11, 2011 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />(12. REPLACE DATA CABLES IN CITYBUILDINGS, Continued) • <br />Franchot stated he would not accept that amendment and that he would amend his motion to approve <br />replacement of the cabling in the city hall facilities up to $28,348 but that he would be opposed to any <br />piecemeal of the bid. <br />McMillan asked if the City currently has WiFi. <br />Olson indicated there is a wireless access point located in the hallway and that it is a secured access point. <br />McMillan asked if this would be in addition to the WiFi. <br />Olson stated the WiFi is a shared 100 megabyte circuit and that if there are three computers on it, the <br />speed would drop down to what the City currently has with the Category 4 cable. <br />VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 1, Printup Opposed. <br />13. PERFORMANCE EVALUATION FOR CITY ADMIMSTRATOR <br />Loftus noted she has been with the City for one year now and that she has provided two evaluation forms <br />for Council review. The first form was previously used at the six month review and the second form is a <br />more detailed option. The City Council may want to choose one of the attached evaluation forms or <br />revise as necessary. The chosen form will be e- mailed to the City Council and should be returned to the <br />mayor by April 29th so she can prepare a summary of comments for the discussion. The individual forms • <br />will be put into the city administrator's personnel file. The City Council may also want to consider <br />gathering staff input from the department heads using the Staff input form that is attached. <br />Loftus stated she would propose a closed session at the City Council meeting scheduled for May 9"' to <br />discuss her evaluation. <br />Franchot stated from a philosophical perspective, it is important to keep in mind the difference between <br />five different evaluations and a City Council evaluation that speaks with one voice. Franchot indicated he <br />prefers the latter and that he feels it is important the Council come together and have a common message <br />to Jessica both on performance and things to improve or change. <br />Bremer indicated she is in agreement with Council Member Franchot and that she would recommend the <br />second form be utilized. Bremer noted the forms were obtained from the city attorney. Bremer indicated <br />she likes the numerical rating and the fact the form encourages comments. Bremer recommended the <br />mayor be the collector of the information and then have an open discussion with the Council about the <br />information and to come up with an average for each category. <br />Bremer commented she would also like to have Staff provide input as well. Bremer stated each staff <br />member could either provide their input directly to the mayor or appoint one staff person that would then <br />compile the information and present it to the mayor. <br />Franchot asked if it would be written input. <br />Bremer commented it could be but that in her view oral input would also be helpful. Bremer indicated <br />she personally prefers written comments since it allows someone to remain anonymous if they so choose. <br />Page 28 of 30 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.