My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-28-2011 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
2011
>
03-28-2011 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/26/2012 4:16:47 PM
Creation date
7/26/2012 3:52:25 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
. MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, March 28, 2011 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. • <br />(8. CRYSTAL BAYROAD SPEED BUMPS, Continued) <br />Sean Foy, 3345 Crystal Bay Road, stated there are three options in the original proposal but only two <br />options were presented tonight. <br />Loftus stated the permanent and temporary speed bumps typically look the same. <br />Foy asked when the road is scheduled to be repaved. <br />Loftus stated it is not scheduled within the next 10 years. <br />Foy commented that the City is spending millions of dollars on one road and yet on this project they are <br />talking about assessing the residents even though it is a safety issue. People drive through there at <br />excessive rates of speed all the time, especially in the wintertime. Someone is going to get hurt and it will <br />be on someone else's conscience if something is not done to improve the situation. <br />Mark Zagaria, 3295 Crystal Bay Road, stated in terms of the speed humps or bumps, he has some issues <br />with them. One is that anyone driving on the road has already accepted the responsibility of driving over <br />speed bumps other than the residents on Crystal Bay Road because the bumps are already in Minnetonka <br />Beach and that road only goes to Crystal Bay Road. The speed bumps or humps will not appreciably <br />reduce the traffic. They will slow people down, but the down side of them is that. they are quite noisy. If <br />you walk in Minnetonka Beach, there are those that slow down for the speed bumps and there are those <br />who speed up for them. • <br />Zagaria indicated he does not feel the speed humps will be less noisy and they will make a lot of noise <br />during the middle of the night. Zagaria noted they are proposing one about 50 feet from his bedroom and <br />that he does not want to be listening to that all night long, particularly in the summer with the windows <br />open. While there is a speed problem on the road, he would prefer the speed over the noise. Zagaria <br />indicated he would be happy with the speed bumps or humps as long as they are not within 200 feet of the <br />edge of his property. Since the noise generated from them is considerable, that should be taken into <br />consideration. <br />Josh Jobs, 3375 Crystal Bay Road, indicated he has two kids, one who is three and one who is two. The <br />road was there when he purchased the property, but it is a narrow road and the posted speed limit is 15 <br />miles an hour. There are two thoroughfares to handle cross traffic, and at the time he purchased the <br />property, he did not know there would be an overabundant amount of traffic. The speed on the road is <br />excessive and the volume of traffic is also considerable. Jobs indicated he hopes the City moves forward <br />with increasing the safety for the families in the neighborhood. <br />Ann O'Reilly, 3349 Crystal Bay Road, stated they have resided here for six years but did not have <br />children when they first moved here. O'Reilly stated she is amazed at the amount of traffic currently on <br />the road and that every year it seems to get more and more pronounced. The number of children in the <br />neighborhood has increased. There are numerous children under ten years old and the demographics have <br />changed considerably. <br />O'Reilly stated the residents presented a petition last fall where about 80 percent of the residents <br />acknowledged that there was a problem with the traffic and they requested a cul -de -sac be constructed. <br />The City did not want to do that. O'Reilly stated she appreciates the opportunity to evaluate the is <br />permanent speed humps, which is probably the best option and would be a long -term solution since it <br />Page 16 of 24 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.