Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, March 14, 2011 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. • <br />8. LAND USE APPLICATION/DEVELOPMENT AND WETLAND SIGNAGE <br />Curtis stated with the adoption of the City's wetlands protection ordinance in 2005, the City began <br />requesting buffer edges to be identified on surveys and physically identified on each property with a <br />marker or sign. In order to have consistency in the signs within the City, Staff is suggesting having signs <br />made to have on hand for purchase by developers and property owners. The signs will be brown in color, <br />may display the City logo, and would indicate the wetland buffer boundary as well as direct interested <br />parties to the Planning Department or the City's website for more information regarding wetlands and <br />wetland buffers. <br />Curtis displayed samples of the proposed signs. <br />The City follows the requirements outlined within MN Statute 462.357, Subdivision 3, and City Code <br />Section 78 -98 regarding notification of land use applications - variances, CUPS, rezoning, etc. In <br />addition, the City also provides applicants with an 18" x 24" sign to display at the subject property to <br />allow for identification of the property in question. The small signs are made of a thick plastic and the <br />applicants are asked to display the sign at the property. Applicants can dispose of the signs following <br />Council action as they see fit as the signs are not re -used. For smaller projects, such as a single - family <br />home, the smaller signs are adequate. <br />Occasionally a larger project such as a subdivision or commercial development may necessitate a larger <br />sign for property identification. The City does not currently have any large signage on hand. Staff would • <br />like to have approximately five 2'x 4' signs made. Public Works staff would attach the signs to metal <br />sign posts to use for larger development projects. Public Works staff would store the signs while not in <br />use as well as deliver the signs to the sites when necessary. These signs would be re -used. Staff is <br />suggesting a brown background with clear, bold lettering. The signs would contain no graphics, have a <br />General statement regarding a land use application or development and direct interested parties to contact <br />the Planning Department. <br />The development signs would be re -used and the wetland buffer signs would be a pass - through cost as <br />they will be purchased by developers and property owners. Replacement of the wetland signs would be <br />necessary after approximately 10 years as the signs will fade. <br />Staff recommends the large development signs and wetland buffer signs as designed. <br />Bremer commented she likes the brown color. <br />McMillan stated her only concern is whether the sign is too big. <br />Curtis stated it may appear big, but when it is located out in a field, it does not appear that large. Curtis <br />indicated the brown color would help the sign blend in and that the size could be reduced somewhat. <br />Staff would like to have the sign big enough to contain some basic information. <br />Bremer stated she would be fine with reducing the size. <br />McMillan asked whether it would be expensive to have the City's logo placed on the signs. • <br />Curtis indicated it would be included in the cost. - <br />Page 8 of 22 <br />