My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-28-2011 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
Historical
>
2010-2019
>
2011
>
02-28-2011 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/26/2012 4:16:17 PM
Creation date
7/26/2012 3:44:32 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, February 28, 2011 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />(4. OLD CRYSTAL BAYROAD RECONSTRUCTION UPDATE, Continued) <br />Kellogg stated adjacent to the school's existing pond there needs to be some additional water infiltration, <br />which the School District is willing to grant an easement for. Kellogg indicated they intend to meet with <br />School District representatives on a biweekly basis to keep them updated on the project. <br />Bremer asked whether the School District would be granting the easement free of charge. <br />Kellogg stated they would be providing it at no cost to the City. <br />Loftus stated the School District has requested the City work with them on the rain gardens. <br />Kellogg stated the school's detail and the city's detail for the rain garden work are very similar and they <br />are essentially on the same page in regards to that work. <br />McMillan asked whether the rain gardens would add to the cost of the project. <br />Kellogg stated in his estimation the costs will be lower than anticipated due to the changed routing of the <br />water to the regional pond. The pond to the south was designed to take some of the drainage off the <br />roadway but it lacked the conveyance to get the water to the pond so the routing was changed, which has <br />reduced the costs. <br />• <br />McMillan asked whether the City Council needs to look at the costs for the parking lot and sidewalk. • <br />Kellogg indicated that aspect of the work will be bid as an alternate and the Council can determine at that <br />point whether they would like to proceed with that aspect of the project. Kellogg stated he anticipates the <br />bids will be lower than in the past given the state of the economy. <br />Franchot asked whether the City Engineer would like to get some direction on the irrigation tonight. <br />Kellogg stated they would like to put together a landscape plan for review at the next City Council <br />meeting and that a final decision will need to be made at that point on the irrigation system. <br />Franchot noted he would not be in attendance at the next meeting and stated that if the costs are what have <br />been stated tonight, he would prefer to go forward with the irrigation system since it would protect the <br />City's investment in the landscaping and would also afford the City the ability to water the landscaping in <br />the event of a drought. <br />McMillan asked whether there would be any other aspect to the maintenance agreement with the <br />contractor other than the watering and getting the landscaping established. <br />Kellogg indicated there generally is a two -year warranty period on trees given by the contractor and a <br />30 -day warranty on the sod. After the 30 days the City would assume responsibility of the sod, which <br />would be the sod located outside the curb and would be included in the existing irrigation system. <br />McMillan asked whether the irrigation system would replace the maintenance agreement with the • <br />contractor. <br />Page 4 of 13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.