Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL <br />Monday, February 14, 2011 <br />7:00 o' clock p.m. • <br />(7. #11 -3496 CITY OF ORONO, AMEND CITY CODE 78 -71, NONCONFORMING <br />STRUCTURESAND USES, Continued) <br />Illegal structures, hardcover and uses are not given any special status within the Code. Currently an <br />existing nonconforming structure may be rebuilt within Section 78 -71. The provisions provide that an <br />existing nonconforming structure may be replaced, but is limited to the existing footprint, location, <br />volume and envelope of the current structure. <br />As it relates to a nonconforming structure, the property owner would be able to rebuild exactly what <br />currently exists in the exact location but cannot change the outer envelope or location in any way. <br />Additionally, a smaller structure could be constructed within the nonconforming footprint/envelope area. <br />As a result of the Krummenacher Supreme Court ruling, Staff has reviewed a number of City codes and <br />processes. It is likely these types of applications for hardcover rearrangements would not meet the <br />hardship definition and variances would not be an option. <br />In order to allow a property owner the opportunity to reduce or rearrange existing nonconforming <br />hardcover, City Staff is proposing an amendment to the zoning ordinance which would expand the <br />options for dealing with nonconforming, nonstructural hardcover. The proposed amendment would allow <br />a property owner to remove and reinstall legally nonconforming hardcover within the same zone in a <br />different location or reconfigure the hardcover as long as the nonconforming square footage is not <br />exceeded. • <br />In December the City Council amended the uses within residential districts. This resulted in the removal <br />of gun clubs from the code as a permitted, conditional or accessory use where previously gun clubs were <br />allowed as a conditional use. Staff discussed the implications of becoming a legal, nonconforming use <br />with the Park Gun Club, which is the only gun club in the City. The size of their site and the current rules <br />governing this type of use do not allow for expansion of shooting field areas. The gun club expressed an <br />interest in expanding their hours of operation in the future in order to accommodate more participants. <br />The amendment language proposed to 78- 71(b)(8) will allow the Council to make changes to the hours of <br />operation. <br />The Planning Commission voted 5 to 0 to approve the language as proposed. Staff recommends approval <br />of the ordinance amendment. <br />McMillan asked if a home extends into the 0 -75 foot zone, whether that would be affected. <br />Curtis indicated the proposed amendment would not impact structural hardcover. <br />Bremer noted the ordinance would not allow people to relocate patios. <br />Curtis stated the property owner would still be allowed to have the patio in the exact same location. <br />Mattick stated as long as it is a legal nonconformity located within the 0 -75 foot zone, they would be <br />allowed to rebuild it in the exact same location. Relocating the hardcover, however, would not be <br />allowed. • <br />Page 6 of 18 <br />