Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, July 12, 2010 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />(LMCD REPORT, Continued) <br />White stated at the local mayors meeting two months ago it was the general consensus that it would not <br />be a good idea to eliminate the LMCD. <br />McDermott reported that milfoil harvesting on any of the bays receiving chemical treatment has been <br />suspended until the five year program is over. <br />McMillan asked if the number of charter boat licenses were down. <br />McDermott indicated they are at about the same level. <br />Murphy stated in his opinion there are fewer trips being made but that the charter owners are still <br />maintaining their licenses. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS — KIM KANG, REPRESENTATIVE <br />Kang stated she had nothing to report but would be available for questions. <br />PUBLIC COMMENTS <br />Susan Seeland asked the City Council to review their Natural Resource Inventory, MLCCS and functional <br />assessment of wetlands since the information is incorrect as it relates to their property. Seeland pointed <br />out there is a drainage ditch that runs from the Middle School hockey arena area which is now being <br />labeled as a stream. Aerial photos dating back to the 1930s shows that it is'not a stream and never was a <br />stream and is part of the City's storm water system that drains into the wetland. <br />There is also a wetland on their property that is labeled as a Manage I, which is also incorrect and should <br />instead be labeled as a storm management pond. In addition, it is also labeled as a wetland prairie, which <br />is incorrect. Seeland indicated she is not sure why these things are being labeled incorrectly and that she <br />would like them corrected. <br />White asked whether Staff has been made aware of these inaccuracies. <br />Seeland indicated she has spoken with Mike Gaffron, the Minnehaha Watershed District, and the <br />Metropolitan Council. Her property has also been designated as a regional significant ecological area, <br />which was never disclosed to her. If it is classified as that, it means that the City intends to purchase the <br />property, which she is not aware of. Seeland stated in her view individual property rights are not being <br />respected. The Orono Service Water Management Plan, along with the CIP, includes a nine acre wetland <br />on their property, which means that the City intends to raise the outlet and change its function as part of a <br />public project. Seeland commented she was not informed of that. <br />• <br />40 <br />White stated a number of items are outlined in the plan but it does not mean that it will be funded and <br />completed. • <br />Seeland indicated she cannot keep up with the bureaucracy as it relates to all of the different <br />environmental assessment reports that have already been done. WSB did a report in 2007, but the City <br />Page 6 of 16 <br />