Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, December 13, 2010 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />(6. CONTINUATION OF 2011 BUDGET HEARING, Continued) <br />Franchot asked whether $50,000 is a reasonable amount to reserve for contingencies. <br />Olson indicated in his view it is. <br />Loftus stated out of a $5.8 million budget, a $50,000 contingency is reasonable. <br />Franchot stated he would not be in favor of a zero percent increase for nonunion workers and that perhaps <br />the contingency fund could be cut in half in order to come in with a zero percent budget increase. <br />Franchot stated in his view the golf course losses cannot exceed $10,000, which would then allow them to <br />cut the contingency fund slightly and make it a zero percent budget increase. If the decision is not to raise <br />the levy at all, the City could reduce expenses in other areas. Franchot indicated he is in support of the <br />resolution before the Council tonight. <br />White stated a real message would be to cut the budget by 5 percent, but that he is not sure that can be <br />accomplished. White noted the proposed increase is 0.77 percent, which is a very small increase. <br />McMillan stated she does not want to micromanage the finance director and that she also does not want to <br />rearrange the budget tonight in order to reach a zero percent budget increase. McMillan stated in her <br />view the Council should go ahead and vote on the resolution. <br />VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 1, McMillan Opposed. <br />PRESENTATION <br />7. OLD CRYSTAL BAY ROAD RECONSTRUCTION PLAN UPDATE <br />Kellogg stated in October the City Council authorized his office to complete plans and specifications on <br />Old Crystal Bay Road. They are proposing some minor changes to the plan to increase the functionality <br />of the road and are intending to meet with the school district and the medical office on the proposed <br />changes. <br />Kellogg stated they have met with the state aid office today. The Council had originally directed that they <br />proceed with Option 2, with the third roundabout being bid as an alternate. The state aid office requires <br />you to submit a plan that they can review and comment upon, which makes it different from a City <br />project. Kellogg stated they went ahead and presented Option 2 with a possible third roundabout to the <br />state aid office. By adding the third.roundabout as an alternate bid, the City will need to come up with <br />two designs, which would include a basic design that shows a traditional intersection and then a plan with <br />the third roundabout. This would add approximately $7,000 to $10,000 to the project. <br />Another option would be to have the base bid include all three roundabouts, and if the bid is too <br />expensive, the City can award the contract to the low bidder and renegotiate the bid. Otherwise the City <br />has the option to go through the design process for the traditional intersection and resubmit it to state aid. <br />Both plans will need to be presented at the same time in the bid process. <br />Kellogg reported the soil borings show some petroleum based contamination underneath the roadway, <br />which is similar to the Casco Point project. The soil borings have found contamination at three to five <br />Page 6 of 27 <br />