Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, December 13, 2010 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. • <br />14. #10 -3493 GOOD SHEPHERD LUTHERAN CHURCH, 3745 SHORELINE DRIVE — <br />CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR COLUMBARIUM — RESOLUTION NO. 6014 <br />Mayor White noted some of the neighbors are in attendance tonight and would like to make some <br />statements regarding this application. <br />Joe Anderson, 2464 Dunwoody Avenue, stated his main concern is the use of the private roadway that <br />they own and making sure that their roadway is not used for parking or the storage of equipment during <br />construction. <br />White asked whether the road is posted as a private road. <br />Anderson indicated it is. <br />Dave Owen, Good Shepherd Church, indicated they understand that concern. <br />Anderson stated he also has a concern that there will be additional traffic generated as a result of the <br />columbarium. <br />Mattick asked if there is currently parking allowed on the road. <br />Anderson indicated there is not. <br />Mayor White noted parking on the street would make it difficult for emergency vehicles to access that <br />area. <br />Mattick stated if the road has been signed and posted, the vehicles could be ticketed. <br />Murphy asked what might occur as part of this project that would affect the use of that roadway <br />differently than what it is already being used for. <br />Dave Owen stated he does not envision Good Shepherd doing anything different than what it currently . <br />does once the inurnment garden is constructed. Owen noted the inurement garden is for their members <br />only and that they currently hold memorial services. <br />Paul Carlson, 2466 Dunwoody, stated there are some private easements that are of concern. One of the <br />easements is owned by the church as they previously owned the land on Tract F. The church was granted <br />an easement via a quitclaim deed for $1 in 1963. Carlson stated to his understanding that easement still <br />exists. The neighbors have a concern that the church will decide to use their rights under that easement. <br />They have asked the church to rescind or revoke their easement that exists on that private drive. In 1997, <br />Paula Zachman purchased the home on Tract F, which eliminates the purpose for the easement. The <br />second agreement is a road maintenance agreement that supersedes the one that was signed in 1986 by the <br />church and was conferred to Paula Zachman when she purchased the property. Carlson stated they have <br />concerns that the easement document has survivability and the church will allow people to park there. <br />Mayor White asked what the easement says. 0 <br />Carlson stated the easement reads for driveway purposes as a means of ingress and egress to Tract F, <br />registered land Survey No. 660 over and across Tract H, which is the driveway. <br />Page 20 of 27 <br />