drainage issues - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

s . The perforated drainpipe was cut off ten feet from the property line and plugged. This pipe still serves as an outlet to the house foundation drainage system. The amount of water that can drain through this pipe and percolate into the ground is limited. Therefore,additional foundation drainage can be provided by a sump pump that will pump water into the drainage ditch to the southwest. Since the ground surface elevation above the drainpipe is higher than the basement floor elevation the �vater will back up into the sump before surfacing to the ground. The owner of the new house said that since moving into the house,there has never been any water in the sump. Some sandy soils were encountered on the property, so the amount of foundation drainage is limited. Mr. Vang's comments about the original pipe installation being inappropriate were regarding using this pipe to drain yard surface drainage to the south. This problem has been conected by the drainage ditch to the southwest. Use of this perforated pipe as only an outlet for the foundation drains is appropriate and reasonable and an allowable use within the intent of the City's codes. There is nothing in the codes to prohibit this foundation drainpipe. The water from the foundation drains is existing groundwater and use of perforated drainpipe to discharge this into the ground is reasonable. . I am not clear on exactly what the conversations between yourself and Bruce were. Bruce has told me he indicated that the pipe could not drain surface water and that this problem would have to be conected. This problem has been corrected now and the pipe does not drain surface water. He also indicated that the pipe would have to be plugged and removed from within 10 feet of the property line. This has also been accomplished. Regarding the comments that Bruce made about sending a letter saying that Bruce Bren Construction and the City of Orono would have to correct any future water damages caused by this pipe. Bruce does not have the authority to make these statements or send letters providing these assurances. We have discussed this situation with Bruce and he understands that it would be inappropriate to make such commitments. The City's regulatory function is to take adequate and reasonable steps to facilitate projects to minimize adverse impacts to the environment or adjoining properties. We cannot offer 100% guarantees that everything will be perfect without exposing the City to future liabilities. We believe that the diversion of the surface drainage to the southwest,using the perforated drainpipe only for foundation drainage, and plugging the end of this pipe 10 feet from the property line aze adequate and reasonable steps to handle the drainage in an appropriate manner and protect the interests of all parties involved. We offer our apologies that this issue was not dealt with in promptly. As Bruce's immediate supervisor, I have to admit that I was not totally familiar with the situation and exactly how this issue was being handled. We have discussed this situation with Mr. Vang regarding the importance of promptly responding to citizens and not making promises or commitments that he cannot fulfill. We hope this letter clarifies the history of the project and the City's position on the corrective actions taken to ensure that the drainage from the new house is handled appropriately.