My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-08-2010 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2010-2019
>
2010
>
11-08-2010 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/26/2012 1:37:56 PM
Creation date
7/26/2012 1:37:55 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, November 8, 2010 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. • <br />i <br />(9. CITY OF ORONO — POLICY FOR JOINT USE DOCK SURVEYS, Continued) <br />i <br />Franchot asked why Staff is recommending an updated survey every 10 years. Franchot commented if <br />there are no changes and Staff is inspecting the site every year, it may not be necessary to have the survey <br />updated every 10 years. <br />White commented he is in agreement with that recommendation. r <br />Franchot noted the property owner could also be required to submit a new survey earlier than 10 years if <br />there are changes and suggested Staff incorporate language that would allow some flexibility in the survey <br />requirement. I <br />Bremer indicated she also is in agreement with that. <br />Franchot moved, McMillan seconded, to delete the language requiring updated surveys every 10 <br />years from the policy, and to amend the policy to allow leeway in the requirements for a survey when <br />deemed appropriate by Staff, and to adopt the proposed language policy for joint use dock survey <br />requirements. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. ; <br />10. #10 -3483 CITY OF ORONO — ZONING AMENDMENT — COLUMBARIUM — <br />ORDINANCE NO. 79, THIRD SERIES <br />Curtis stated at the October 25"' City Council meeting, the Council reviewed two options for the ordinance; • <br />one which allowed a 5 -foot setback for columbaria on all properties or a 5 -foot setback from city -owned <br />parks. The application was tabled to allow more time for Staff to research above - ground columbaria with <br />respect to setbacks and height limitations as well as look closer into the year -round screening requirements <br />proposed. <br />At Council's direction, Staff has researched the issue of height, setback and screening. Staff is now <br />proposing additional language which is attached as a draft ordinance. The new language will address <br />height limitations, a definite setback from the street, and screening where it is deemed appropriate. <br />The new requirements are as follows: <br />I <br />j <br />1. Columbaria will have a limitation of eight feet in height; <br />1 <br />2. A 10 -foot setback would be required from property lines and from streets for all above ground <br />columbarium elements; <br />A 5 -foot setback would be required from property lines for any below ground columbarium <br />elements; <br />4. Columbaria will have a 50 -foot setback from adjacent principal structures; <br />5. Appropriate levels of screening could be determined on a site by site basis with the CUP review. <br />McMillan asked whether a 50 -foot setback is required for an in ground columbarium. • <br />Page 8 of 13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.