My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-25-2010 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2010-2019
>
2010
>
10-25-2010 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/26/2012 1:02:14 PM
Creation date
7/26/2012 1:02:14 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, October 25, 2010 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />(10. OLD CRYSTAL BAYROAD RECONSTRUCTION FEASIBILITYSTUDY, Continued) <br />White indicated there are no problems with the right -of -way. <br />Kellogg noted a couple of issues that were discussed at the last committee meeting dealt with the need to <br />obtain some additional right -of -way from the school district if the roundabout option was chosen and <br />expansion of one of the storm water ponds. They will attempt to keep the road as narrow as possible to <br />minimize the hardcover and to keep the speeds lower on the roadway. <br />Murphy moved, Franchot seconded, to adopt the Old Crystal Bay Road Reconstruction Feasibility <br />Report, and to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 5981, a Resolution Ordering Preparation of Plans and <br />Specifications for the Old Crystal Bay Road Reconstruction Project for Option 2. <br />McMillan asked whether there should be alternates for the width of the median. <br />Kellogg asked if the wider median is to be utilized for future plantings. <br />Murphy indicated it is, with the width of the median not to exceed 12 feet. <br />Franchot asked if the bids would also include the cost for a third roundabout. <br />Kellogg stated that would be a good way to find out the actual cost of adding a third roundabout. • <br />I <br />VOTE ON THE ABOVE MOTION: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />Murphy moved, Franchot seconded, to direct the City Engineer to prepare plans and specifications <br />utilizing Option 2, with price alternates being obtained for different widths of the median, not to <br />exceed 12 feet, to allow for future landscaping, and to obtain a bid on Option 2 with and without a <br />third roundabout on the north end. ' <br />McMillan asked what widths the median could be. <br />Kellogg stated if any landscaping is going to be done down the road, the 8 -foot width would be the <br />minimum width of the median. Kellogg stated if the median is four feet wide, they would not be able to <br />put any landscaping in there and that it would encourage people to cross at areas other than at the <br />crosswalks. Kellogg indicated they could do a short fence or plantings to encourage'people to cross at the <br />crosswalks. <br />White commented the 8 -foot versus the 12 -foot width for the median is largely for aesthetic purposes. <br />i <br />VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />• <br />Page 14 of <br />17 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.