My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-13-2010 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2010-2019
>
2010
>
09-13-2010 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/26/2012 1:00:40 PM
Creation date
7/26/2012 1:00:40 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, September 13, 2010 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />(10. ADOPT 2011 TAXLEVYAND BUDGET, Continued) <br />Bremer stated the insurance contributions would go up quite a bit for the individual Staff members <br />without the increase. Bremer stated given the economy, when you have 46 people, you need the best 46 <br />people you can get. When people are let go because of financial reasons, you need 46 employees who are <br />happy with their job and are willing to stay. Bremer stated a one percent increase is not an outlandish <br />increase, <br />Franchot indicated he is in agreement with Council Member Bremer and that the people who get the <br />opportunities are typically the best people and that the City does need to stay competitive. Franchot <br />stated in his view this conversation is somewhat odd and that he does not understand why the City would <br />not approve the maximum levy in order to retain some flexibility with the budget. Franchot stated in his <br />opinion there is no reason to not approve option one since it gives the City some flexibility, especially <br />given the shortfall with the police department. <br />Franchot stated while it is easy to talk about holding things to zero, the City needs ideas for where that <br />money is going to come from. Franchot reiterated the City Council should go with option one to leave <br />the options open. <br />White noted every year the City has typically approved a higher levy than what was adopted since it does <br />give the City some flexibility in developing the budget. White stated the City will do its best job at <br />keeping expenses down and that currently Orono has one of the lowest tax rates in the metro area. <br />• Murphy moved, Franchot seconded, to approve Option 1 and adopt RESOLUTION NO. 5966, a <br />Resolution Adopting the Proposed 2010 Tag Levy Collectible in 2011, and to adopt RESOLUTION <br />NO. 5967, a Resolution to Adopt the Proposed 2010 General Fund Budget. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 1; <br />McMillan Opposed. <br />11. NO PARKING ZONE ON KELLEY PARKWAY — RESOLUTION NO. 5968 <br />Franchot moved, Murphy seconded, to approve RESOLUTION NO. 5968, a Resolution <br />Authorizing the Installation of Signs Prohibiting Parking on the South Side of Kelley Parkway. <br />VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />12. METROPOLITAN LIVABLE COMMUNITIES PROGRAM PARTICIPATION <br />Gaffron stated the City has participated every year in this program and that this year marks the end of the <br />original period for goal setting. The City has been asked by the Metropolitan Council to establish new <br />housing goals for 2011 to 2020 if they are going to participate in this program. The Metropolitan Council <br />have defined what they believe the correct goals are. <br />All cities and townships within the 7- county Metropolitan Council jurisdictional area are annually <br />requested to complete a Livable Communities Act Survey, which is used to produce Housing <br />Performance Scores for each community and assist the Metropolitan Council in developing household <br />and population estimates. Housing Performance Scores are one of the facts considered when the <br />Metropolitan Council evaluates and ranks applications for competitive funding programs. <br />• The Metropolitan Council has established that Orono's fair share of the projected affordable housing <br />needs for the metro area between now and 2020 is 311 units. Based on an acknowledgement that there is <br />PAGE 11 of 14 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.