Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, August 23, 2010 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. • <br />(6. DRAFT OLD CRYSTAL BAYROAD TRAFFIC STUDY, Continued) <br />indicated, they do not want to do something that is obscuring a pedestrian crossing but that they would <br />want to limit the places where they can cross to something that is clearly signed and motorists are <br />expecting. <br />As it relates to the unsafe speeds, one option is to narrow the roadway to an 1.1 -foot width and install curb <br />and gutter along the roadway, which will make an uncomfortable sensation for the driver to travel at a <br />higher rate of speed. The goal is to physically or psychologically bring the speed down. The last item is <br />high visibility or high impact spots for pedestrian crossings, such as painting a ladder crosswalk. Signage <br />can also be erected with blinking LED lights to be more noticeable, which are effective year- round. <br />Alternative one is the lowest cost and has the lowest right -of -way impacts. This alternative addresses <br />some of the traffic congestion areas by attempting to implement right -turn lanes and left -turn lanes at key <br />intersections. At the middle school there would be a right -tam lane. If a motorist wants to continue <br />straight through on Old Crystal Bay Road, they will be able to bypass those cars waiting to turn. The <br />same thing can be done at the high school. This alternative will result in an improvement in traffic <br />conditions but will not address the right -angle conflicts. There will still be left turning vehicles <br />competing with right tam vehicles at the key intersections. Israelson noted alternative one is the cheapest <br />option. <br />McMillan asked whether the stop signs would be removed. • <br />Israelson indicated they can be removed. In addition, all three alternatives provide the option of <br />consolidating some driveways or converting them to right in/right out, which will be looked at during the <br />feasibility study. <br />Alternative two will have the best impact on traffic operations by removing all left turns. Each driveway <br />would be a right in/right out. This option is the most expensive. There will still be the right turn lane and <br />bypass lane. If you want to turn left into the school driveway, you will need to go down to the <br />roundabout and come back up Old Crystal Bay Road to the driveway. There will still be access into the <br />City Council facilities off of Kelley Parkway. A disadvantage to this option, in addition to the <br />roundabouts, is the fact that motorists will need to go down to the roundabout and then come back up Old <br />Crystal Bay Road. <br />Israelson noted they are proposing full size roundabouts due to the fact that they have tractor trailers and <br />school buses that will need to navigate the roundabouts. They have arrived at a reduced footprint for <br />some of the roundabouts. This option will help improve traffic operations by removing a number of left <br />turns from the roadway and reducing the speed along the corridor. This option includes having one <br />driveway that will allow access to semi- tractor trailers and school buses. Israelson noted the left -turn <br />conflicts will be improved considerably over alternative one. <br />White commented it also provides a pedestrian barrier. <br />Israelson stated there can be an additional pedestrian crossing that can be provided north of the <br />roundabout. Given the benefit and cost, they would recommend Alternative 1 or 3. Israelson noted <br />alternative three provides the greatest benefit and safety for the cost. 0 <br />Page 10 of 18 <br />