My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-09-2010 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
2010
>
08-09-2010 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/26/2012 12:59:31 PM
Creation date
7/26/2012 12:59:31 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, August 9, 2010 <br />• 7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />(5. #10 -3471 TERRYSCHNEIDER ONBEHALF OF WOODHILL SENIOR COTTAGES OF <br />NAVARRE, 2525 & 2545 SHADYWOOD ROAD, Continued) " . <br />Schneider stated now is the time to plan a trail and that since they have a 35 -foot setback, there is <br />adequate room to integrate a trail. Schneider indicated they would be willing to grant an easement for a <br />trail but that they would like to plan for that now if the City requires it. <br />Curtis pointed out a trail easement is not required since it is not a subdivision. <br />Turner stated Staff would also need to check with Hennepin County because the information Staff has <br />received is that a trail likely would be beyond the right -of -way. <br />White commented that Staff can look into that issue, and that the main issue is the combining of the two <br />lots. White stated the facility will change the use of the neighborhood and that the Council will need to <br />look very carefully at this application and its impacts on the neighborhood. <br />White commented the owners of the facility will need to take extra caution with flammable materials <br />given the nature of the residents but that the ambulance could shut off its sirens once it gets close to the <br />facility. <br />Bremer indicated she is not in favor of a second building and that she has a concern with the marketability <br />is of the structure. Bremer pointed out there is another memory care facility being proposed for the City and <br />that she does have a concern that this facility may not be as accessible to emergency services as another <br />lot. <br />Bremer stated she would like to feel comfortable with the environmental impact as it relates to this <br />facility and asked whether the current plan as drafted has been reviewed and approved by the City <br />Engineer. <br />Kellogg stated there are some issues that still remain to be addressed but that there is sufficient space to <br />handle the storm water and drainage. <br />Murphy commented there are several stages of Alzheimer's and that the need for residents of a memory <br />care facility to have appropriate structure and quiet is extraordinary. Murphy commented this facility in <br />his view would be good in this neighborhood but that he would not be in favor of the second building. <br />Murphy commented in his view it is a workable project and that the fire department will take extra steps <br />to handle this facility with care. <br />McMillan asked if they are only looking at phase one at this time, whether the residential lot will be <br />separated from the land area calculations and storm water requirements. . <br />Turner stated because the applicant is requesting to plat all of the land into one lot, the zoning would not <br />change but that Staff would look at the entire property as one lot. At the time the second building is <br />proposed, Staff would need to look at the requirements at that point in time. The residential zoning would <br />not change with this application. <br />White stated the one lot creates the bulk to accommodate the building and comply with the regulations. <br />• <br />Page 7 of 17 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.