My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-09-2010 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
Historical
>
2010-2019
>
2010
>
08-09-2010 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/26/2012 12:59:31 PM
Creation date
7/26/2012 12:59:31 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, August 9, 2010 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. • <br />(5. #10 -3471 TERRYSCHNEIDER ONBEHALF OF WOODHILL SENIOR COTTAGES OF <br />NAVARRE, 2525 & 2545 SHAD YWOOD ROAD, Continued) <br />a means of combining the lots. It also takes a residential property and turns it into commercial, which is <br />spot zoning. Stoddard pointed out the subject property and the residential property in question. Stoddard <br />illustrated the residential zones that surround this site. <br />Stoddard stated this use would change the;residential character of Navarre since it is a 24/7 facility and <br />would result in ambulances and police coming to the site routinely regardless of how well managed the <br />facility is. This lot is the furthest south of any commercial property in Navarre. The best location for this <br />type of project is close to a hospital or other commercial properties along Highway 12. <br />Stoddard stated in his view this location is not proper since it is a residential neighborhood. Stoddard <br />encouraged the Council to place restrictions against combining the residential lot with the commercial lot <br />and to require the developer to work with the neighbors on landscaping. <br />Julie Thomas, 2620 Kelly Avenue, stated they do recognize that this type of property is preferable to an <br />office building or a similar use and that it will be a relatively quiet use. Thomas indicated one of the <br />biggest reasons for her family staying in the area is because of the green space, the preservation of the <br />vegetation, and a priority to preserve the wildlife. Thomas stated in her view a number of the wildlife <br />will be lost as well as a lot of privacy. Thomas pointed out their house and the hill that is on the subject <br />site. If a second building is constructed, the residents will be able to see into their house, which is a big • <br />concern of theirs. Thomas stated in her view the second building will be against the City's philosophy to <br />preserve distinct rural areas. <br />Marilyn McClaskey, 2693 Kelly Avenue, stated she was impressed by Mr. Schneider's presentation and <br />the improvement over the last proposal they brought for this property. McClaskey indicated she has <br />resided in high density areas in the past and that on almost every block there was a nursing home, a <br />halfway shelter or a homeless shelter and that they got tired of people in the suburbs saying not in my <br />back yard. McClaskey stated she does not have any concerns about locating this facility on this site but <br />that she does not feel taking that large residential parcel and combining it with this lot would be a good <br />idea since it affects the wildlife and green area. The small children in the neighborhood and other <br />residents enjoy having some peace. McClaskey stated to destroy the habitat would be a great shame and <br />would also reduce the neighbors' property values. McClaskey stated in her opinion the combination of <br />the lots should not be done. <br />McClaskey expressed a concern with the second stage and how that area would be accessed by the <br />equipment needed in order to construct the second building. McClaskey requested that the lots not be <br />combined and the second building not be constructed. <br />Janice Berg, 2655 Lydiard Avenue, presented a petition to the City Council in opposition to the <br />application. Berg stated she is opposed to the project and that the residential lot should remain <br />residential. The mass of the buildings is bigger than the church and the Snyder's building. The Snyder's <br />building is 11,000 square feet and is now empty. Berg asked if an environmental assessment has been <br />done regarding the wildlife and the runoff. Berg indicated she concurs with Mr. Stoddard that there will <br />be traffic the neighbors will need to contend with.' <br />Page 4 of 17 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.