Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, May 10, 2010 <br />• 7:00 o `clock p.m. <br />(9. FOREST ARMS COUNTRY CLUB HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION (FACCHA) 2010 <br />JOINT USE DOCK LICENSE, Continued) <br />issuing retroactive licenses on 2 to 3 year rotation due to workload commitments in other areas. The <br />decision to require a current survey of the property and dock configuration for the 2009 license year was <br />due to many of the files containing very old, incomplete, or inaccurate sketches, site plans, or surveys. <br />In the 2009 license year, the licensees were notified of the new survey requirement. Seven of the eleven <br />licensees complied by submitting updated surveys with their 2009 applications. The licenses have not yet <br />been issued but the City has not prohibited any of them'' rom using their docks. The 2010 license <br />applications were mailed at the end of March. <br />The LMCD and the City of Orono share concurrent jurisdiction in the matter of licensing joint use docks. <br />The first Joint Use Dock License was issued to FACCHA in 1983. Since that time the configuration of <br />the docks changed and the City has a number of different iterations of the dock layout plans /or surveys. <br />In 1993, a new configuration was approved by the LMCD and a survey was conducted. The City did not <br />receive a copy of the 1993 survey until the 2003 permitting season. This survey was used until the 2009 <br />season when an updated version was requested. Currently the FACCHA is requesting a waiver from the <br />updated survey requirement. <br />Tom Barrett, Forest Arms Country Club Homeowners Association, stated the City's recent survey dated <br />2003 is the survey that the homeowners association has on file and it has been approved by the LMCD <br />without any corrections. The lots have not changed over the years that would require a new survey. The <br />• <br />only change has been to construct a small canoe rack for the neighbors, which is the only improvement <br />that has been made on that lot to date. No new hardcover or structure has been added. Barrett indicated <br />he feels the City's current survey is adequate and the association would question why a new survey is <br />necessary if nothing has changed. <br />In a letter dated May 5fl' from the City, Planner Curtis stated the decision to require a new survey dated <br />2007 or newer was based on the City having already received a 2007 survey from a licensee. Barrett <br />indicated he is not sure how that relates to the homeowners association and questioned how 2007 is <br />significant. <br />Barrett stated he also has a question relating to the application process. The application process for the <br />City of Orono and the LMCD are two different application processes. Barrett asked why those <br />application processes cannot be combined for the joint docks. The LMCD is stricter than the City of <br />Orono's requirements and the homeowners association meets those requirements every year. Requiring a <br />new survey could be a hardship on some members. Given the poor economy, some members are facing <br />foreclosure and/or not working. If a new survey is required, the homeowners association would like to <br />have a letter from the City stating whether a new survey is going to be required every year, every two <br />years, or what the standard will be so adequate planning can be done by the homeowners association. <br />White asked how long the surveys would be good for. <br />Curtis stated Staff's intent was to obtain updated surveys and bring each property up to a level of <br />information that is more current. Staff will continue to conduct annual inspections of the property and <br />will not require a new survey unless something changes on the property. <br />• <br />Page 7of17 <br />