Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, April 26, 2010 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />(7. ORONO 2010 -2030 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE, Continued) <br />Metropolitan Council is expecting to see that the number of units per acre on average never falls below <br />three units per acre. <br />Murphy asked if that is three units per acre for the whole city. <br />Gaffron indicated it is three units per acre for the areas included in the MUSA. <br />Murphy asked what the expectation is for the unsewered areas. <br />Gaffron stated the Metropolitan Council would like no more than one unit per ten acres with the idea that <br />at some point in the future, when those areas develop, they would develop at three units per acre. Gaffron <br />noted there are very few properties that are left within the City that are over 10 acres. There are <br />approximately 30 to 50 properties within the City that are over 10 acres. Those properties are also <br />scattered throughout the City, which does not provide any rationale for inserting a high density <br />development. <br />Murphy asked Gaffron to explain what some of the difficulties the City has encountered with the <br />Metropolitan Council have been over the last 10 years. <br />Gaffron stated one of the first ones was for properties that were put into MUSA in 1998. The City had <br />expected that the Metropolitan Council would allow those properties to hook up to municipal sewer. • <br />Those permits were denied on two separate occasions because the City did not meet the three units per <br />acre density in their Comprehensive Plan. <br />Franchot noted the City's residential mixed use has been developed largely in response to Metropolitan <br />Council's suggestions. Franchot asked how committed the City is, particularly in the Navarre area, to <br />stay with the mixed used district. <br />Gaffron noted the City does have the opportunity to submit an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan at <br />any time. The City has done a number of amendments since 2000, so it is not an unusual process. If it <br />meets the Metropolitan Council's goals, it is likely they would approve it. <br />McMillan asked how the exemption would work in neighborhoods with houses that are of varying ages. <br />Gaffron indicated those are for areas outside of MUSA and consist of neighborhoods that have two acre <br />lots. The first two questions that would need to be asked are, when were the houses built and do they <br />have alternate septic sites. The criteria are that it has to be pre -1995 construction and there must be proof <br />that there is no available alternative septic site. There are a number of pre- and post -1995 neighborhoods <br />scattered around the City and it will be difficult to leap frog over certain neighborhoods. Gaffron <br />indicated that is one of Metropolitan Council's policies that may change in the future. Staff will attempt <br />to help them understand the impacts of that policy and that he expects the Metropolitan Council will be <br />looking at a 20 -year time frame. <br />White opened the public hearing at 8:03 p.m. <br />Randy Gilbert, Mayor of Long Lake, stated he understands the dilemma faced by Orono in trying to fit • <br />within Metropolitan Council's template but that the City of Long Lake objects to Orono's Comprehensive <br />Page 6of15 <br />