Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, April 26, 2010 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />(7. ORONO 2010 -2030 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE, Coy :thmed) <br />White commented that the City Council cannot delay formal action on the Comprehensive Plan much <br />longer and that once the process is started, it will give the Council a chance to focus on what it will really <br />mean in reality. The City will get to choose how developments should be allowed. White noted the <br />traffic situation in Navarre is not something that the City really can deal with since it is a county road but <br />that they have prevented the roads from becoming a major freeway which will attract even more people. <br />White stated if the road is widened through Navarre, the traffic would double. <br />McMillan stated given the sheet that was distributed by Mike Gaffron, she is unsure whether she can <br />make a decision on the plan tonight. McMillan stated if the City has the opportunity to reduce density <br />somewhat, she would be in favor of looking at analysis over the next two weeks and revisit it at the next <br />council meeting. McMillan stated in her view the high density goes against everything Orono believes in <br />and that the City Council should take their time on it and make sure it is exactly the way they want it. <br />Once the land is reguided, there is an expectation that is set, and the City Council should be comfortable <br />with the proposed density. <br />Bremer asked if there is a deadline. <br />Gaffron indicated the City is past the deadline and that two weeks probably would not make a difference <br />to the Metropolitan Council but that it cannot be delayed for another two months. <br />r 1 <br />U <br />Franchot stated he would like to move forward even though he understands Council Member McMillan's • <br />position. Franchot noted the City still retains a lot of authority to dictate how the development will <br />happen. <br />McMillan stated the Comprehensive Plan lays out a future of high density and that the Council needs to <br />be very sure about it. McMillan stated she does not know why the City Council has to approve it tonight <br />given its importance. McMillan indicated she appreciated the citizens' input and that they have tried to <br />condense the process into this past month and that another two weeks would be appropriate. McMillan <br />reiterated she would like more time to review the information provided by Planner Gaffron. <br />Murphy moved, Franchot seconded, to approve the requested changes for the reguiding of 3245 <br />Wayzata Boulevard, and to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 5929, a Resolution Granting Preliminary <br />Approval of the Orono 2010 -2030 Community Management Plan. <br />Gaffron asked if the City is going to allow reguiding of the Eisinger property and approve the Klingelhutz <br />property addition, but not approve any changes to the fire station site, not remove the Mud and bowling <br />alley site, and not approve any other requested changes. <br />Murphy stated it is his understanding that they are not approving any of the latest corrections or changes <br />and that they are adopting what is proposed. <br />McMillan reiterated that there is no reason to rush this and that the Council was given some information <br />tonight to help guide them on how density could be reduced and still meet the Metropolitan Council <br />requirements and it is worth another, two weeks to think about it. <br />Bremer asked what would happen to Area F, 2525 Shadywood. <br />Page 10 of 15 <br />• <br />