Laserfiche WebLink
i,. , . <br />CITY OF ORONO <br />Local Board of Appeal and Equalization <br />Wednesday, April 21, 2010 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />Mischke stated he reduced it from $534,000 to $501,000. <br />White requested Mr. Mischke provide his information to the assessors. <br />Murphy noted that the real estate market last year and the year before has been in a state of decline and <br />that it is difficult to find comparables. The Board attempts to find obvious discrepancies in the <br />valuations, such as an extra bathroom being included in the valuation. There are a number of 50 -foot <br />wide lots on the lake. Developers are not buying property and the amount of development has declined in <br />this market. <br />Kunik stated there are sales that are not arms - length transactions available but that the Assessor's Office <br />is not able to utilize those by state statute in valuing someone's property. <br />Mischke asked why they are exempt. <br />Kunik stated there are a number of things that the state considers non -arms length sales, such as bank <br />sales and foreclosures. <br />Stulc stated those types of sales will influence the market but that they are not allowed to take those into <br />consideration when determining valuation of properties. <br />is <br />Kunik pointed out the Assessor's Office has certain parameters that they are required to follow. As the • <br />assessor looks at a property, they look at sales that are deemed good and use those as comparables. <br />Steve Harris, 3850 Watertown Road, noted that foreclosure sales accounted for 43 percent of the house <br />sales in Minnesota last year. <br />Kunik stated they are only looking at this area and not the rest of Minnesota. Foreclosures are generally <br />not considered a significant influence and are not used as comparables. <br />The Board directed the Hennepin County Assessor's Office contact Mr. Mischke to review his property <br />and documentation. <br />2. BRAD BLANKENSNIP, 2605 LAFAYETTE ROAD, PID #21- 117 -23 21 -0007 <br />Blankensnip stated he would have been in here last year to complain about his valuation but was <br />unfortunately in the hospital. Blankensnip distributed some information to the Board. <br />Blankensnip stated that he has a copy of an appraisal that was done by Molly Brown for a refinancing of <br />his home and that he feels this appraisal is accurate. The process of the appeal was very thorough and is <br />well documented. The difference between Hennepin County's valuation of $1.9 million and the real <br />estate appraiser's valuation of $1.5 million is too great to ignore. <br />Blankensnip noted that all of the comparables used in his appraisal are located on Lake Minnetonka. The <br />comparables are properties that are roughly in the same condition as his and were built between 1947 and • <br />1952, which at today's standards would probably be a tear -down. Blankensnip stated that unfortunately <br />some of the comparables are too far away to meet the standards, which is typical in this type of <br />PAGE 2 of 6 <br />