My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-12-2010 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2010-2019
>
2010
>
04-12-2010 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/26/2012 12:53:57 PM
Creation date
7/26/2012 12:53:57 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
4 <br />• <br />MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, April 12, 2010 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />(4. Funding Request for Milfoil Project, Continued) <br />willing to write a personal check for half of the $3000 if that will help the residents. Murphy stated he cannot <br />commit the City's funds to this given the other issues the City is facing. <br />A resident noted that the property owners on the lake are required to pay higher property taxes to be on the lake <br />and that there should be a decrease in their property taxes due to the milfoil and their inability to use the lake. <br />The lake is a public resource and is used by the public. Right now it is not useable for the residents but they are <br />paying a higher tax rate. The residents are funding the majority of the project personally. <br />Murphy stated if the residents were in attendance at a school board meeting tonight instead of here, there would <br />be a lot of people within the Orono Alliance that would say basically the same thing. The tax situation in the <br />state is severe and there is a lot of personal money that is being raised for the band students and other <br />organizations. Murphy stated he is willing to commit his personal money to this project but that he does not feel <br />it is good for the City to do it. <br />A resident in the audience noted that 75 percent of the boats on the lake are not the residents' boats. It is a <br />public resource and other fishermen utilize the lake. Dick Osgood has run the numbers and has found that after <br />10 years you can treat the entire lake for what is being spent today. The City would just be using the money it <br />contributes to the LMCD and would be getting rid of the harvesters. The costs for Gray's Bay this year are 25 <br />percent less than the first year's budget. In five years, the cost for treating the whole bay will be $15,000 and <br />• that the costs will go down once the problem is under control. <br />McMillan stated it is known that the costs will go down in future years but that the LMCD has concerns at this <br />time about expanding the treatment. Lake Minnetonka is for public use, and as good stewards, the City needs to <br />think of the entire lake. McMillan noted there are people who are against the use of chemicals but that invasive <br />species are very dominant and can ruin the ecology of a lake. McMillan noted that Zebra mussels have changed <br />the ecology of the Great Lakes. It is an ongoing battle on many different fronts to preserve the water quality of <br />Lake Minnetonka. The pilot program is interesting but the City needs to proceed forward with caution. <br />McMillan stated she appreciates the residents becoming aware of the situation and of all the time and effort spent <br />by them. <br />Bremer stated obviously people have differing opinions on whether or not to use chemicals in the lake, and that <br />the City has to look to the LMCD for guidance on this issue. Bremer indicated she is in support of providing <br />funding for the first year but that she does have a concern with future funding of the pilot project. Bremer <br />pointed out the City is not required to do anything next year simply because the City supports it this year. <br />Bremer stated she does not feel that by agreeing to fund it this year the City is legally obligated to fund it in <br />future years but that the city does have the philosophy to protect and preserve the lake. <br />Bremer commented if you look at real estate in other cities, they have a lot higher tax rate than Orono. The <br />lower tax rates are in part because of good financial stewardship of the City. Bremer stated in her view milfoil is <br />one of the causes that steps beyond that and that she would challenge the rest of the Council to think about the <br />huge commitment the City has to Lake Minnetonka. Orono abuts 41 percent of the lakeshore. Carman's Bay is <br />one of the worst bays on the lake for milfoil and that she does not feel this is a slippery slope with other bays <br />requesting funding. Bremer stated she is tired of seeing the signs that say there is milfoil on the lake and that <br />• she has been told that this treatment is our best shot at solving the issue. <br />Kay Owen, Casco Point, stated as a general rule, it is good to make decisions based on facts and data. In this <br />situation the City has the opportunity to fund a research project that will provide facts and data for the future. <br />Page 9 of 15 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.