My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-08-2010 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
2010
>
03-08-2010 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/26/2012 12:53:06 PM
Creation date
7/26/2012 12:53:06 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
• <br />MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, March 8, 2010 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />( #10 -3442 THE EMILYPROGRAM, 2180 NORTH SHORE DRIVE, Continued) <br />Tina Paulson, 240-5h Street East, St. Paul, stated she is entering the Emily Program in two days at their <br />_St. Paul location and has been going to the Emily Program for the past four months. Paulson indicated she has <br />been dealing with an eating disorder since she was 13 years old and that she is now 42 years old. The Emily <br />Program has been very beneficial. Paulson stated she has read articles on the Star Tribune website but does <br />not feel that the comments left truly represent the Emily Program. Paulson stated she is not trying to say the <br />school should or should not be used but that she would like to break some stereotypes of what will be coming <br />to the Orono community. <br />Paulson stated she personally feels that anything can work at this site if the community truly cares. As it <br />relates to the pictures that were just shown, she has the impression that the residents would have said that is <br />too busy of a location, you can't find parking, and that they really do not care. <br />Jeanne Fayfield, 2220 French Creek, stated the key issue before the Council is the appropriate land use of the <br />former Hill School site. Fayfield stated we are a city and a state and a nation that is guided by a constitution, <br />with laws derived from that constitution that protect, preserve, and govern our society. The City of Orono has <br />created and adopted a guiding philosophy that is available on the home page of its official website. There are <br />four points of City of Orono's philosophy, which include the following: Protect and preserve Lake <br />Minnetonka, its water quality and its recreational assets; protect and preserve our many natural resources and <br />open spaces; and most importantly, to preserve our distinct urban and rural land use patterns and lifestyles, and <br />. to preserve our local character and identity. <br />In addition, Municipal Code Section 78 -05 states: Use of land for residential purposes is considered primary <br />with other uses considered supporting this use. It is not the intention to expand or allow all such commercial <br />and industrial activity to a degree where it conflicts with the primary residential use and other guiding <br />principles. <br />Fayfield asked the mayor and the council members, as well as the greater Orono community, to revisit the <br />City's Comprehensive Plan. This plan has established policies and principles to guide orderly and economic <br />private development and public improvement in the years ahead. The document is dated going forward to the <br />year 2030. Fayfield requested the Council's attention be focused on the facts of the Hill School property <br />proposed zoning change. <br />The Emily Program is requesting a conditional use permit and associated variances to locate a 24/7 inpatient, <br />for profit, eating disorder facility in a zoning district zoned primarily for residential. Many neighbors <br />surrounding the Hill School are opposed for the reasons of excessive traffic, safety issues, parking <br />inadequacies, lighting, noise, the higher volume of business activity, increased emergency responses, and <br />decreased property values. Most importantly is the concern for the permanency of the conditional use permit <br />that stays with the property and is not granted to the owner. The conditional use permit cannot be surrendered <br />even if the applicant requests it. <br />Fayfield stated they are neighbors in close proximity to the former Hill School, and they recognize that <br />allowing a facility like this will significantly alter the land use, the character of the neighborhood, and their <br />lifestyles by volume of use. What is not on the agenda tonight is what would be the best use of the former Hill <br />School property going forward. Many ideas have been discussed by the neighbors. The neighbors do not feel <br />• this is the only option. A number of residents have pledged financial support to the Art Center and are willing <br />to do whatever else is necessary to find an appropriate use for the property. <br />---f Page 9 of 23 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.