My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-08-2010 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
2010
>
03-08-2010 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/26/2012 12:53:06 PM
Creation date
7/26/2012 12:53:06 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, March 8, 2010 <br />• 7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />1( #10 -3442 THEEMILYPROGRAM, 2180 NORTH SHORE DRIVE, Continued) <br />Bremer stated this has been a very helpful process and that it is emotional both ways. The City Council needs <br />to base its decision on a document that was drafted a long time ago that did not envision these things when the <br />City was going through its Comprehensive Plan review. Bremer stated she will need to rely on her training <br />and expertise that she gained serving on the Planning Commission, which taught her that as part of this <br />process, each property should be treated as unique and that you have to take the property as is and accept that <br />the applicant has the best of intentions. <br />Bremer stated she would welcome going through the CUP process first before discussing the IUP. If the vote <br />were held tonight for a CUP, Bremer indicated she would likely vote no because the conditional use permit <br />does run with the property. Bremer stated she would like to know specifics on exactly what the parking <br />requirements are. Bremer noted tonight the City does not have enough parking at the Orono City Hall <br />building, but that 99.9 percent of the time there is ample parking. Bremer commented that the City needs to be <br />realistic and realize that a person cannot accommodate every situation. Bremer stated another uncertainty is <br />the impact this facility will have on the traffic, but that she personally does not feel this facility will add much <br />to the traffic in the area. Bremer noted the City has required applicants in the past to undergo traffic studies, <br />which may become necessary if this application proceeds to the next step. <br />Bremer stated in her view a conditional use permit is too permanent and too much of a shift from the Hill <br />School and that an 10P should be discussed. <br />• Murphy stated for those who were in attendance at the first meeting, he would like to assure everybody that the <br />issue before the City Council is about the use of the land more than anything else. Murphy commented he <br />personally feels the program is fantastic and that they are trying to help people who have one of the most <br />difficult disorders there is. <br />Murphy stated as the process has proceeded along, and also taking into account the larger community, the <br />conditional use permit has several fatal flaws in it. The City Council has not had the opportunity to take an <br />indepth look at a landscaping plan, the parking situation, or the traffic situation, and that the application has <br />gotten somewhat hung up on the emotional side of things. <br />Murphy stated he is intrigued with how something other than a CUP might or might not work for this site. <br />Since the application is about a facility that helps save lives, he would not be troubled extending the time <br />period so those questions can be answered more clearly for everyone. <br />McMillan noted she has received a number of letters regarding the land use issues. McMillan stated in her <br />view this is an issue about land use and that a conditional use permit for a new use should meet minimum <br />setbacks to assure that the commercial use is not a detriment to the neighborhood. McMillan stated it is also <br />an intensification of use from a day school to a 24/7 inpatient client as well as outpatient. McMillan noted the <br />City has not gotten any definitive answers on how big the outpatient portion would be. <br />McMillan stated in addition to the intensification of use, there would be a substantial amount of renovation <br />required to convert the existing building into a residential health care facility. The applicant would invest a <br />substantial amount of money and the building would take on a new life as a health care facility. McMillan <br />commented that businesses and uses come and go but the buildings and their permitted uses remain. Residents <br />• come and go but the houses remain. Future councils are then left to deal with any issues that arise. McMillan <br />stated it is very important that the City Council look at the conditional use and what will be there in the years <br />to'come and not get hung up on the business that is there currently. <br />- Page 19 of 23 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.