Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, March 8, 2010 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />( #10 -3442 THE EMILYPROGR,4M, 2180 NORTHSHORE DRIVE, Continued) <br />Julie Ann Peterson, 1355 Arbor Street, noted she is one of the closest neighbors to the school and that she has <br />lived there for 20 years. The Hill School has gone through a number of iterations over the years and they have <br />always been good neighbors. Peterson stated she has enjoyed the kids and would watch them walk over to the <br />Crystal Bay Park for recess. <br />Peterson stated her concern is the 24/7 operation as opposed to the Hill School's five day a week weekday <br />operation. Peterson stated she sees the building from her property and that it is a large two -story building <br />adjoining her back yard. Peterson encouraged the City Council to think about the impact this would have on <br />her patio and deck. Peterson indicated she works in the health care industry, which is a busy, stressful job, and <br />that she loves sitting outside in her yard in the evenings. The Art Center is quiet and has its parking over by <br />County Road 51. Peterson stated this facility will have lights on in the evening and the residents will want <br />their windows open on a nice day, which will mean that she will be able to hear their conversations and other <br />noise generated from the building. Peterson stated this will change the residential character of the <br />neighborhood. <br />• <br />Aaron Printup, 2195 Prospect Avenue, stated he resides in a 110 year -old, one bathroom, one bedroom home <br />with his 15 -month old daughter, and has been a life -long resident of Orono. Printup indicated he is a <br />correctional officer with the Department of Community Corrections and Rehabilitation. Printup stated he is <br />opposed to the CUP and that the issue is about preserving the character and integrity of the laws in Orono's <br />Community Management Plan, specifically relating to land use. The Hill School is zoned for rural residential. • <br />Preservation being the guide, that should lead the City Council to vote no on the CUP. Hill School sits on a <br />site that consists of .58 acre, which is too small for a hospital facility. <br />Printup stated according to county property information, Hill School was purchased eight years ago for <br />$210,000 and is reportedly selling for around $875,000. With the proposed renovations, it would be <br />approaching the $3 million mark, which does not make sense for a lot that is .58 acres. Crystal Bay is a <br />residential zone and not a commercial zone. If the current applicant were to vacate the property, the next <br />entity to move in would be another health care facility. The CUP goes with the land. If that is the case, there <br />is no stopping my neighbor from selling to a health care facility because a precedent has been set by the CUP <br />being granted to the Hill School. <br />Printup stated from the beginning of this application process, mistakes may have been made and that perhaps <br />land use wasn't look at originally. Printup commented he is thankful so many friends and neighbors did so <br />much legwork. The Hill School is a historic landmark and variances of the past were associated with a school, <br />not a new hospital. No new variances should be issued. Hospitals are not allowed in rural residential. <br />Commercialization belongs in Navarre and not in Crystal Bay. Printup encouraged the City Council to protect <br />Crystal Bay from the encroachment of incompatible land uses and to maintain the historic identity and <br />characteristics of Crystal Bay by voting no on this application. <br />Printup pointed out that Hill School is guided by rural education land use and it is stated in that section that the <br />Hill School be relatively small and low key. Making this a 24/7 hospital is not low key. The health care plan <br />being suggested should be located in the Navarre area. If the Hill School becomes a hospital, it will always be <br />a hospital. The City cannot guarantee that it will not evolve into something else.. The applicant has suggested <br />that the City could cancel the CUP, which is not legal. The applicant has offered to withdraw the CUP if they <br />ever leave, which is also not legal. The CUP goes with the land. The fact is, with the CUP, any type of drug • <br />or rehab facility could operate at this site due to the Americans with Disabilities Act. Printup indicated that <br />attempts to develop an IUP will not work either because of the same problems. <br />Page 14 of 23 <br />