My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12-11-2006 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
2006
>
12-11-2006 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/25/2012 4:44:29 PM
Creation date
7/25/2012 4:44:29 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, December 11, 2006 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. • <br />(13. #06 -3245 SHARRA TTIMANEY FOR LA URENCE AND ARDELL JONES, 3605 NORTH <br />SHORE DRIVE, Continued) <br />In November the Planning Commission voted 4 to 0 to recommend approval of the setback variance from <br />North Shore Drive subject to review of the width of the shared roadway by the Fire Marshal and approval <br />of the structural lot coverage, lakeshore setback, and average lakeshore setback variances subject to the <br />open porch and lakeside overhang not being converted to enclosed space. <br />The Fire Marshal indicates that since the shared driveway serves more than two houses, a 20 -foot wide <br />fire lane must be maintained. This width is'maintained on the three lots to the southwest. On this <br />property the existing shared driveway is about 17 feet wide adjacent to the existing garage and about 14 <br />feet wide nearer the northeast property line adjacent to the RV parking space. On the property to the <br />northeast the shared driveway is about 12 feet wide. <br />The applicant proposes to narrow the shared driveway to 15 feet adjacent to the new garage while <br />maintaining 14 feet nearer the northeast property line. If the planting bed were reduced to the depth of the <br />eave and the shared driveway widened a foot or two opposite the northeast corner of the garage, the <br />shared driveway would be 20 feet wide. The alignment of the shared driveway northeast of the garage <br />will depend on where the shared roadway on the property to the northeast could be widened in the future <br />and the acceptability to the County of further encroaclment of the shared driveway into the County right - <br />of -way. Without knowing the location of the shared driveway and the resulting hardcover figure, Staff <br />could not draft a resolution. <br />Staff requests the Council direct the applicant to, one, provide a revised site plan that provides the . <br />required 20 -foot wide fire lane in a location acceptable to the Fire Marshal and, if further encroachment <br />into the County right -of -way is proposed, the County Transportation Department; two, provide revised <br />hardcover calculations that exclude the shared driveway from lot area and hardcover; and three, direct <br />Staff to draft a resolution granting the setback and hardcover variances based on the revised survey and <br />hardcover calculations. <br />Mr. Maney stated they have worked diligently with Staff on their project to comply as much as possible <br />with City regulations given the constraints of the property. The recommendation of the Fire Marshal <br />came as a surprise given the existing conditions on either side of this property. Maney inquired whether <br />there are other options that could be pursued in lieu of the Fire Marshal's recommendation. Maney noted <br />they have made other improvements to the property and roadway in front of their residence.. <br />Murphy stated he is not prepared to direct Staff to prepare an approval resolution on this application until <br />all the required infornlation is before the Council. Murphy stated on rare occasions the City Council has <br />approved road widths that are different from the recommendation of the Fire Marshal as long as the <br />people affected understand clearly the consequences. Murphy pointed out those other occasions have not <br />involved other properties. <br />Gaffron stated in those cases when the City Council granted some flexibility to the recommendation of <br />the fire marshal, there have been other provisions requested, such as bump -outs for parking. The fire <br />marshal has expressed a concern regarding the parking in this area. Gaffron noted there does appear to be <br />a bottleneck near the Sundby residence, which could restrict emergency vehicles. <br />CJ <br />PAGE 8 of 17 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.