11-27-2006 Council Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MINUTES ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, November 27, 2006 7:00 o'clock p.m. (5. #05 -3135 ALLEN MUNSON, 3165 NORTH SHORE DRIVE, Continued) results in a 29 -foot defined height and meets the City's code. Gaffron stated the applicant's defined height would become less as he goes further back into the hill. White stated the Council would be directing Staff to' draft a resolution either approving or denying the application tonight. Brokl stated action would need to be taken on both Murphy asked if the City Council directs Staff to c need to redesign his plans and start over. Munson stated he has been working with Staff for Murphy stated he is reluctant to approve the house encroaching six feet into the average l of the house changes. Gaffron stated there should be relative minor average lakeshore setback. tonight in order to meet the 60 -day deadline. a denial resolution, whether the applicant would two years on this project. .al use permit since the grading plan is based on the setback and the grading may change if the location in the grading if the house is relocated out of the . Brokl stated the Council has the discretion of approving a conditional use permit up to a certain amount of . fill. Brokl stated if the applicant is able to meet the requirements of the City, he would not need to appear before the Council again. McMillan moved, Murphy seconded, to direct Staff to draft a resolution reflecting denial of the average lakeshore setback variance and approval of the conditional use permit to allow fill not to exceed 2400 cubic yards, subject to review and approval of the grading and drainage plan by Staff and the City Engineer. Murphy asked Mr. Wagener whether he would like to entertain a discussion with the applicant on that corner of the house encroaching into the average lakeshore setback. Sansevere stated the average lakeshore setback regulation should be respected. Murphy stated he was suggesting the two parties attempt to negotiate the encroachment since they have to reside next to one another but that he would withdraw the question. McMillan stated the parties have had an opportunty to discuss this application in the past. Munson inquired why he was considered for a is the line. Murphy asked when this application first appe Gaffron stated in June of 2005 the application PA when one of the Council members stated the line before the City. appeared before the Planning Commission 7of10