My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-27-2006 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
Historical
>
2000-2009
>
2006
>
11-27-2006 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/25/2012 4:40:29 PM
Creation date
7/25/2012 4:40:29 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY. COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, November 27, 2006 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />(5. #05 -3135 ALLENMUNSON, 3165 NORTHSHORE DRIVE, Continued) <br />The revised proposed residence has a flat roof with a parapet. The top of the parapet is about 30 feet <br />above the existing lakeside grade. The prior plan showed a 27 -foot height on the lakeside. The new plan <br />meets the City's height limits. The portion of the house within the average lakeshore setback consists of <br />two stories and is a six-foot encroachment. <br />The City Engineer has not had an opportunity to review the revised plans. <br />Staff recommends approval of the fill CUP, subject to confirmation by the City Engineer that the grading <br />and drainage plan is acceptable. The applicant is proposing to bring in approximately 2350 cubic yards <br />and will be placed on the landward side of the house. Council should review with the applicant the basis <br />for not meeting a 5 -foot fill setback. <br />Sansevere inquired whether the house could be pushed back six feet and still keep the same footprint. <br />Gaffron stated the location of the house probably relates to topography and the view of the lake. <br />Munson stated the further back from the lakeshore you go, due to the tree line, the side lakeshore view is <br />lost. <br />• <br />Sansevere commented the fill issue is not a major issue, but inquired whether Mr. Wagener's view would <br />be impacted by the encroachment. <br />Wagener stated he has met with the applicant three different times, with a request being made of the • <br />applicant to set corner posts, which was completed, and his surveyor marked the elevations of the <br />proposed house. Wagener stated the Mandel house pushed the average lakeshore setback closer to the <br />lake. Wagner stated he would like to see a house that is similar to the existing house, which is more a <br />low - profile structure. <br />Sansevere stated the applicant is not excessive on the height but that he does have a concern with the six <br />feet encroachment being proposed. Sansevere commented the City Council generally listens to the <br />comments of the neighbors when attempting to reach a decision on a variance request and that the City <br />Council encourages the neighbors to work together to reach a workable solution. <br />Munson stated he has attempted to contact Wagener numerous times but has been unable to reach him <br />personally. <br />Sansevere stated he is not supportive of the encroachment if it impacts a neighbor's view of the lake. <br />Munson stated there are two extremes, with the house to the north being located 75 feet from the <br />lakeshore and the other house being located 300 and some feet back from the lakeshore. <br />Murphy stated the average lakeshore setback is one of the more stringently enforced ordinances of the <br />City. Murphy questioned whether the applicant feels it is okay to encroach into the lakeshore setback due <br />to the trees and still be okay with locating his house in a position that would impact the neighbor's view. <br />Murphy stated he does not see a hardship in this situation to grant the variance. • <br />PAGE 4 of 10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.