Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, October 23, 2006 <br />• 7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />• <br />• <br />(5. <br />#05- 3080INTERSPACE WEST, 200i WAYZATA BOULEVARD WEST, Continued) <br />and by requesting final plat, that is proof that <br />project remains the same as was originally ap <br />been obtained. <br />Fenning stated if the Council would like to wi <br />would like to have renewal of the preliminary <br />Sansevere pointed out the applicants are 13 <br />with the financing. <br />are not abandoning the preliminary. Fenning stated the <br />;d, some sales have been made, and the financing has <br />Id final plat approval, that would be okay, but that they <br />approval. <br />past the deadline and that the Council is not concerned <br />Fenning stated the financial conditions were part of the preliminary plat and they'would like that approval <br />extended, with a requirement that they reapply for final plat. <br />McMillan stated she has some real concerns with the application, noting that the Council went to great <br />effort to grant both preliminary and final approvIal, and an enormous amount of Staff time was consumed <br />in trying to obtain the appropriate permits. McMillan stated Mn/DOT is not able to issue permits within <br />five days, noting that the permits were not applied for until five days prior to the deadline. McMillan <br />stated she has major concerns regarding the way this application is being handled. <br />Fenning stated in Orono simultaneous preli <br />that it is typical in most other communities. <br />White stated the Council is required to follow <br />the appropriate amount of time to obtain the n <br />and final plat approval might be out of the ordinary but <br />ordinances and that the applicants should have allowed <br />sary permits. <br />Fenning stated in speaking with Planner Gaffrori it was his understanding that by making application that <br />they would qualify for final plat approval if all the conditions were met. <br />Gaffron stated that is not true and that his disc <br />permits had to be on file with the City and not <br />Ferming stated when he was informed that they <br />they could obtain final plat approval if all condi <br />Gaffron stated all conditions have not been met. <br />in with the applicants on numerous times is that the <br />applied for. <br />on the agenda for October 23rd, they were told that <br />were met. <br />Anders stated they are requesting a renewal of the plat for a specific number of days due to the unique <br />situation and that they apologize for the delay in Iobtaining the necessary permits. Anders stated the delay <br />was related in part to obtaining the necessary financing and that at this time they are requesting renewal of <br />the preliminary plat. Anders stated requiring them to go through the whole process again will not gain <br />much and it would require additional staff time. Anders stated all parties would be best served by a <br />renewal of the preliminary plat. <br />McMillan stated there was conditional approval given on October 10, 2005, and that she has to go with <br />the original approval and deadline. 11 <br />PAGE 7 of 12 <br />