Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES -OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monda�, October 23, 2006 <br />• 7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />• <br />U <br />(4. METROPOLITAN COUNCIL EN <br />COMBINATION, Continued) <br />Cook illustrated a couple of the designs that <br />Woodbury. <br />ONMENTAL SERVICES — LIFT STATION <br />been utilized for other lift stations in Lino Lakes and <br />The City Council took no formal action on thisl item. <br />PARK COMMISSION COMMENTS <br />No representative was present. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS i ROLAND JURGENS, REPRESENTATIVE <br />Jurgens stated the Planning Commission felt <br />beneficial. Jurgens stated he would be availE <br />PUBLIC COMMENTS <br />None <br />ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT <br />(Items 5, 6 and 7 follow Item 8) <br />8. #06 -3229 TIMOTHY V. AND CHE: <br />RENEWAL RESOLUTION NO. 5525 <br />Timothy Peterson, Applicant, was present. <br />recent work session with the City Attorney was <br />for questions.. <br />PETERSON, 560 BIG ISLAND — VARIANCE — <br />Gaffron stated the applicant is requesting a lot area variance to permit development of a lot 3.33 acres in <br />size of which 1.1 acres is dry and where 5.0 acres of dry buildable is normally required in order to <br />construct a seasonal cabin on an existing vacant lot. The applicants are also proposing a side setback <br />variance in order to allow a portion of their covered porch to encroach four feet into the required 50 -foot <br />setback. <br />On September 8, 2006, the Planning C voted 5 -0 to recommend approval of the lot area <br />variance, stipulating that the proposed structure comply with the required setbacks. <br />Staff is recommending approval of the lot area <br />Tim Peterson stated it is not a screened -in porch <br />octagonal in shape. Peterson requested a setbac <br />are required to build within due to wetlands on t] <br />foot setback is required on the west side; the clo; <br />140 feet to the setback line and 91 feet from the ] <br />language regarding aesthetic purposes. Peterson <br />octagonal shaped corner rather than a square con <br />P. <br />and denial of the side setback variance. <br />►ut a deck and the 1.5 feet that is into the setback is <br />variance be granted due to the small footprint that they <br />east and lakeshore in the front. In addition, a large 50- <br />;st neighbor is also located to the west and his home is <br />roperty line; and finally, the laws for setbacks include <br />Mated the cottage would be more pleasing with an <br />3of12 <br />