Laserfiche WebLink
C <br />• <br />• <br />• <br />MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday; October 9, 2006 <br />7:00' o'clock p.m. <br />(7. #06 -3231 WILLIAMS. DAMPIER, <br />Commissioner Kempf commented having the <br />situation. <br />McMillan stated to her knowledge the Planning <br />they reviewed this application. <br />01VYPLACE, Continued) <br />of the events is helpful in understanding the <br />did not have the 2000 resolution at the time <br />Dampier stated he was at 17.8 or 17.4 structural coverage at the time he purchased the house and that it <br />was an existing nonconforming structure to begin with. Dampier indicated his original proposal did not <br />involve going beyond the original footprint. <br />Murphy noted the shaded oval area on the <br />Gaffron confirmed that is correct. <br />was never a part of any approved plan. <br />Murphy stated that portion would be a considerable change in the structure of the house and that he <br />cannot understand the circumstances that Staff and the building inspector would agree to go ahead with a <br />structural change of that magnitude on an application that the City Council had not reviewed. Murphy <br />stated he is unable to understand how the City can proceed forward with this addition. <br />Sansevere inquired whether the applicant's <br />verbal approval. <br />Dampier stated that is correct. <br />for the application is that the building inspector gave <br />Sansevere stated he would be willing to table this application to allow the Council to hear from the <br />building inspector on whether he verbally approved that addition. If the building inspector did in fact <br />verbally approve this application, that he would support the application. <br />White concurred that it would be useful to hear from the building inspector in this application. White <br />commented that this is a signature house in the City of Orono and an enormous amount of work has gone <br />into the house. White stated he would also support the applicant if the building inspector indicates that he <br />did give verbal approval to the applicant. White noted the applicant does not have a good view of the lake <br />due to the location of his neighbors' houses. I <br />Sansevere suggested the building inspector <br />Peterson moved, Sansevere seconded, to <br />Place. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />to the tape of this meeting. <br />PAGE 7 of 10 <br />#06 -3231, William S. Dampier, 3550 Ivy <br />