My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-25-2006 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
Historical
>
2000-2009
>
2006
>
09-25-2006 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/25/2012 4:37:48 PM
Creation date
7/25/2012 4:37:48 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
r <br />MINUTES OF THE 1 <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, September 25, 2006 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />• <br />*4. #06 -3206 KEN AND LORIJEAN ANDERSON, 4225 FOREST LAKE DRIVE — <br />VARIANCE — RESOLUTION NO. 5512 <br />White moved, Murphy seconded, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 5512, a Resolution granting <br />variances for the property located at 4224 Forest Lake Drive. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />*5. #06 -3210 STEVEN WEBSTER AND SANDRA LARSON, 500 AND 540 ORONO <br />ORCHARD ROAD SOUTH — LOT LINE REARRANGEMENT AND VACATION OF ALLEY — <br />RESOLUTIONS NO. 5513 and 5514 <br />White moved, Murphy seconded, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 5513, a Resolution approving a <br />subdivision of a lot line rearrangement for properties located at 500 and 540 Orono Orchard Road <br />South, Application No. 06 -3210. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />White moved, Murphy seconded, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 5514, a Resolution vacating the 12- <br />foot wide alley within Block 13 of the plat of Minnetonka Bluffs in the City of Orono, Hennepin <br />County, Minnesota, Application No. 06 -3210. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />6. #06 -3212 HEMPEL PROPERTIES, OUTLOT A STONEBAY (NW CORNER OF <br />WILLOW DRIVE NORTH AND HIGHWAY 12) — COMMERCIAL SITE PLAN REVIEW AND <br />COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT <br />Jeff Wrede with Tushie - Montgomery Architects; Sara Malin, Hempel Properties; and Alex Young, MSB • <br />Development, were present. <br />Gaffron noted this application was discussed at the September 11 Council meeting when only three <br />council members were present. Since the applicants are requesting a comprehensive plan amendment, a <br />four -fifths vote is required. <br />Sansevere inquired whether anything with the application has changed since the Council's work session <br />on this matter. <br />Gaffron stated very little has changed. At the work session the Council had suggested the applicants look <br />at the potential uses for the site and the architectural design of the buildings. <br />Wrede distributed some preliminary color depictions of the retail building and office building. Wrede <br />stated their intent is to design the two buildings with the same basic style. <br />Sansevere stated to his understanding the issue with this application at the last Council meeting was the <br />potential type of uses for this site rather than the design of the buildings. <br />Murphy concurred that the Council spent a considerable amount of time discussing the uses for this site <br />Wrede stated they did not anticipate being first on the agenda tonight and that a representative from <br />Hempel will be attending the meeting tonight and will be addressing that issue. Wrede stated it is their <br />intention to find tenants that comply with the list previously developed by the Council. <br />is <br />PAGE 2 of 14 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.