09-11-2006 Council Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

ORONO CITY C Monday, Ser • 7:00 0' THE �IL MEETING w 11, 2006 p.m. (5. #06 -3208 RYAN COMPANIES US, INC., 2'65 WAYZATA BOULEVARD WEST, Continued) Brokl stated that is standard language that has been used for phased projects. Turner stated the other issues are the credit for the pa I ing of the trail toward the park dedication fee and a reduction in the letter of credit that is required to be on file. Turner stated the City typically requires 150 percent of the estimated cost of improvements and the applicant is requesting it be reduced to 125 percent. White inquired whether the code would need to be chI nged if the amount is reduced. Gaffron stated the subdivision code would need to be (changed and a public hearing would be required. Brokl stated 125 percent is standard in the industry White stated in his experience with other de, percent and that he would not be opposed to Gaffron inquired whether the City has the option of subdivision code. s in other cities he has not seen it higher than 125 the 125. it at 125 percent without changing the Brokl stated the Council could accept the 125 percent and direct Staff to look at the subdivision code to see whether that section of the code should be amended. •Murphy moved, McMillan seconded, Application #06 -3208, Ryan Companies US, Inc., 2765 Wayzata Boulevard West, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 5504, a resolution granting preliminary approval of a Class III subdivision, with the understanding the language would be amended to require a letter of credit for 125 percent of the estimated cost of improvements rather than 150 percent, and to reflect that the cost of constructing the trail along Wayzata Boulevard be credited toward the park dedication fees. McMillan requested clarification of Item No. 8. Turner stated this reflects conversations with the Ci applicant to provide an access to the 2687 Wayzata City cannot compel the applicant to provide that ac Turner stated the language allows the two property access. McMillan inquired whether there is any language Attorney regarding the issue of requiring the )ulevard property, the Western Steel property. The ,s even if compensation is granted to the applicant. to be able to negotiate agreement on the to full turning access being provided. Turner indicated there is not. Turner stated the access is not a joinfaccess and that the driveway will eventually move to the eastern end of the property. Turner stated it may be a shared driveway if an agreement is reached. 1 McJilton stated their understanding is it allows • required to come to an agreement. VOTE: Ayes 3, Nays 0. to negotiate with Western Steel but that they are not PAGE 9 of 20