Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />MINUTES 'OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, August 28, 2006 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT <br />*5. #05 -3147 STEVE AND JANNA SUNDBY, <br />AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT — RESOLU <br />NORTH SHORE DRIVE — VARIANCE <br />ON NO. 5498 <br />White moved, Sansevere seconded, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 5498, a Resolution granting a <br />conditional use permit for the property located at 3587 North Shore Drive. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />*6. #06 -3180 BRUCE SCHMITT ON <br />CREEK CIRCLE — VARIANCE — RESC <br />White moved, Peterson seconded, to adopt RESC <br />lakeshore setback and average lakeshore setback <br />Creek Circle. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />7. #06 -3189 TERRY AND SUZANNE <br />Terry and Suzanne Johnson, Applicants, were <br />Curtis noted this application was tabled at the May 22 <br />was tabled in order for the applicants to redesign then <br />applicants have been working with their designer and <br />The following is a summary of the Council's requests <br />1. <br />2 <br />0 <br />Meet the required 10 -foot side yard setbacks <br />reflects 10 -foot setbacks on both sides. <br />Work around the water supply well location <br />location cannot be adjusted. The applicants l <br />permitted water supply location as shown on <br />Locating the home five feet ahead of the <br />adjacent neighbors support the variance. <br />property owners supporting the encroacl. <br />Reduce 75 -250 foot zone hardcover by reduc <br />how the driveway will function as proposed. <br />53.9 percent hardcover within the 75 -250 fo( <br />to allow 47.1 percent hardcover where 25 pe <br />by reducing the footprint of the home, reduc: <br />driveway. <br />OF WILLIAM ULRICH, 2280 FRENCH <br />NO. 5499 <br />NO. 5499, a Resolution granting <br />for the property located at 2280 French <br />543 PARK LANE — VARIANCE <br />" Council meeting. At that meeting the application <br />plans to meet the Council's direction. The <br />staff to reduce and revise their variance requests. <br />both sides. Curtis noted the revised survey <br />d/or provide proof that the water supply well <br />ve proposed to work their design around the <br />ie revised survey. <br />ige lakeshore setback may be appropriate only if the <br />applicants have provided letters from adjacent <br />into the average lakeshore setback. <br />ig the size of the lakeside patio and demonstrate <br />�t the last meeting the applicants were requesting <br />zone. Their request has been revised to a variance <br />ent is normally allowed. This was accomplished <br />the size of the proposed lake -side patio and <br />PAGE 3 <br />